Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Chile

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Re-injected > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Re-injected per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Chile
Consumption	103.3 billion cu m Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Chile	5.3 billion cu m Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 20 times more than Chile	142,213.42 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Consumption per capita	2,805.47 cu m Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Chile	139.03 cu m Ranked 31st.
Imports	31.31 billion cu m Ranked 18th. 8 times more than Chile	3.83 billion cu m Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	102,164 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 238 times more than Chile	430 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	646,600 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 40 times more than Chile	16,074 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 40 times more than Chile	0.058 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	638,219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 24 times more than Chile	26,711 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	504,864 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 140 times more than Chile	3,598 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 71 times more than Chile	0.221 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 88 times more than Chile	70.02 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 27th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	1.93 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 20 times more than Chile	97.97 billion cu m Ranked 51st.
Reserves	1.69 trillion cubic feet Ranked 13th. 25 times more than Chile	67.78 billion cubic feet Ranked 41st.
Reserves per capita	52,333.5 cubic feet Ranked 19th. 13 times more than Chile	4,148.67 cubic feet Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 177 times more than Chile	1,129 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	663,314 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 16 times more than Chile	40,646 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Exports	4.07 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 6927 times more than Chile	587 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 6 times more than Chile	19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	453,203 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Chile	134,262 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 70% more than Chile	8.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	2.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Chile	0.171 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 6 times more than Chile	19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	11.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	15.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 34% more than Canada
Including LNG > Net > Production	7.17 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 87 times more than Chile	82,254 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.21 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 34 times more than Chile	65,285 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Chile	4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Re-injected > Per capita	15.6 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 1300 times more than Chile	0.012 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd. 24% more than Chile	5.78 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	75,200 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 80 times more than Chile	939 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.8 Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Chile	0.507 Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	89.5 Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Chile	8.2 Ranked 44th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.6 Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Chile	0.8 Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	15.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 71 times more than Chile	0.22 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 89 times more than Chile	69.83 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	612.28 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Chile	131.66 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	11.53 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 49% more than Chile	7.72 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	16.22 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 57 times more than Chile	0.286 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 20 times more than Chile	0.986 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	2.28 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Chile	0.171 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	11.28 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	15.04 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 33% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 122 times more than Chile	0.026 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	26.02 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Chile	2.57 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 40 times more than Chile	0.0575 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	19.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 12 times more than Chile	1.63 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	20.53 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Chile	2.49 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	125.83 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3231 times more than Chile	0.0389 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Chile	19.61 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	68.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Chile	4 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Re-injected per 1000	15.59 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 1260 times more than Chile	0.0124 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	51,396.94 cu m Ranked 25th. 9 times more than Chile	5,712.28 cu m Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.97 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 8 times more than Chile	0.234 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Imports per capita	491.89 cu m Ranked 24th. 12 times more than Chile	41 cu m Ranked 15th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Chile	0.3 Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Chile	2.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	372,423 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Chile	126,127 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 120 times more than Chile	0.0263 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 70 times more than Chile	88.57 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Chile	19.61 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	255.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 47 times more than Chile	5.49 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	221.87 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 44 times more than Chile	5.03 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.52 Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Chile	0.458 Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.25 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 27 times more than Chile	1.34 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	80.5 Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Chile	7.4 Ranked 44th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-284,510 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	7,470 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Chile	1.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	694,103 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 26 times more than Chile	26,711 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Chile	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.17 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 54 times more than Chile	21,823 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 27 times more than Chile	1.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	840,678 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 20 times more than Chile	42,015 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 70 times more than Chile	88.8 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 138 times more than Chile	1,447 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	612.53 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Chile	132 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	54,387 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 7 times more than Chile	8,135 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	19,784 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 9 times more than Chile	2,151 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Chile	0.499 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 49% more than Chile	7.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	73,696 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 26 times more than Chile	2,794 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 12 times more than Chile	320,428 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	16.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 57 times more than Chile	0.286 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Imports	364,396 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 48% more than Chile	245,644 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	125.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 3228 times more than Chile	0.039 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	524,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Chile	4,668 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 12 times more than Chile	320,428 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8.27 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 92 times more than Chile	89,716 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Re-injected	503,705 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 2519 times more than Chile	200 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,972.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 8 times more than Chile	234.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Total resources	63.72 million Terajoules Ranked 19th. 17 times more than Chile	3.82 million Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Proved > Reserves	1.75 trillion cu m Ranked 21st. 18 times more than Chile	97.97 billion cu m Ranked 51st.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Chile	0.3 Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.03 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 71% more than Chile	8.22 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Chile	0.498 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Proved reserves per capita	55,831.64 cu m Ranked 22nd. 10 times more than Chile	5,690.32 cu m Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-8,805.088 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	457.22 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	20.01 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 20 times more than Chile	0.984 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.48 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Chile	1.63 Terajoules Ranked 35th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Chile in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Chile

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Chile in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Chile in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation