Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Denmark

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Denmark
Consumption	103.3 billion cu m Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Denmark	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Denmark	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption per capita	2,805.47 cu m Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Denmark	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th.
Imports	31.31 billion cu m Ranked 18th. 123 times more than Denmark	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	102,164 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 26 times more than Denmark	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	646,600 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 20 times more than Denmark	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 16 times more than Denmark	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	17.6 Ranked 3rd. 20 times more than Denmark	0.9 Ranked 38th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	182.8 Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than Denmark	9.4 Ranked 38th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	6.79 Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than Denmark	0.35 Ranked 38th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	5.71 Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Denmark	1.74 Ranked 19th.
Proved reserves	1.93 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 45 times more than Denmark	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th.
Reserves	1.69 trillion cubic feet Ranked 13th. 21 times more than Denmark	81.98 billion cubic feet Ranked 38th.
Reserves per capita	52,333.5 cubic feet Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Denmark	15,127.05 cubic feet Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	19.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	20.53 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Denmark	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	125.83 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Denmark	43.01 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Denmark	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	68.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Denmark	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	51,396.94 cu m Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Denmark	11,049.66 cu m Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.97 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Denmark	0.59 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Imports per capita	491.89 cu m Ranked 24th.	0.0 Ranked 98th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Denmark	0.2 Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Denmark	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	372,423 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Denmark	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Denmark	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Denmark	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	255.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Denmark	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	221.87 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Denmark	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.52 Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark	0.907 Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.25 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Denmark	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	80.5 Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Denmark	4.9 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	804.66 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th.	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 19% more than Canada
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	23,201 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Denmark	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Denmark	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	638,219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 21 times more than Denmark	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 16 times more than Denmark	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	504,864 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 48 times more than Denmark	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Denmark	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	663,314 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 23 times more than Denmark	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	54,387 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 11 times more than Denmark	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	19,784 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Denmark	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 88% more than Denmark	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 49% more than Canada
Including LNG > Exports	4.07 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 17 times more than Denmark	233,085 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Denmark	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	453,203 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Denmark	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 30% more than Canada
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	2.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 52% more than Denmark	1.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Denmark	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 18 times more than Denmark	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8.27 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than Denmark	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	7.17 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 16 times more than Denmark	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.21 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 28 times more than Denmark	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Denmark	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,972.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Denmark	590.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Total resources	63.72 million Terajoules Ranked 19th. 20 times more than Denmark	3.2 million Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Proved > Reserves	1.75 trillion cu m Ranked 21st. 29 times more than Denmark	61.3 billion cu m Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.8 Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark	0.999 Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.03 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 30% more than Canada
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	804.66 Terajoules Ranked 5th.	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 19% more than Canada
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 88% more than Denmark	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-8,805.088 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 39 times more than Denmark	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	20.01 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Denmark	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.48 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Denmark	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	26.02 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Denmark	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	694,103 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 22 times more than Denmark	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Denmark	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.17 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 26 times more than Denmark	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Denmark	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	840,678 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 25 times more than Denmark	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	612.53 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 33% more than Denmark	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	73,696 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Denmark	8,106 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 18 times more than Denmark	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	16.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark	5.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	125.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Denmark	43.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	524,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than Denmark	27,092 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd.	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	75,200 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 97 times more than Denmark	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	89.5 Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Denmark	5.4 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.6 Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Denmark	0.5 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Denmark	0.2 Ranked 48th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	5.14 Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Denmark	1.57 Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	15.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Denmark	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	612.28 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 33% more than Denmark	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	11.53 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 49% more than Canada
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	16.22 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark	5.06 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	6.79 Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than Denmark	0.35 Ranked 38th.
Proved reserves per capita	55,831.64 cu m Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Denmark	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Denmark	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	2.28 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 52% more than Denmark	1.5 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	164.5 Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than Denmark	8.5 Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-284,510 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 232 times more than Denmark	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Denmark	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Denmark in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Denmark

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Denmark in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Denmark in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation