Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Georgia

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Georgia
Consumption	103.3 billion cu m Ranked 5th. 52 times more than Georgia	1.97 billion cu m Ranked 10th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 7 times more than Georgia	373,582.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption per capita	2,805.47 cu m Ranked 5th. 7 times more than Georgia	394.63 cu m Ranked 21st.
Imports	31.31 billion cu m Ranked 18th. 16 times more than Georgia	1.96 billion cu m Ranked 31st.
Imports per capita	491.89 cu m Ranked 24th. 25% more than Georgia	392.35 cu m Ranked 6th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	102,164 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 28 times more than Georgia	3,618 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	646,600 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 79 times more than Georgia	8,198 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 91 times more than Georgia	0.0255 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	20.53 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 21 times more than Georgia	0.964 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 10 times more than Georgia	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	68.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 19 times more than Georgia	3.56 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.97 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 28 times more than Georgia	0.0716 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	51,396.94 cu m Ranked 25th. 27 times more than Georgia	1,907.79 cu m Ranked 66th.
Proved reserves	1.93 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 227 times more than Georgia	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 22 times more than Georgia	0.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	372,423 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 39 times more than Georgia	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Georgia	0.836 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 40 times more than Georgia	153.16 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.01 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Georgia	1.16 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 10 times more than Georgia	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	255.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 1948 times more than Georgia	0.131 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	221.87 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 1875 times more than Georgia	0.118 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.25 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 15 times more than Georgia	2.42 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2005 est.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	2.28 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 175 times more than Georgia	0.0131 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	11.28 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	11.36 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 1% more than Canada
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-284,510 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	284 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 93 times more than Georgia	0.025 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	504,864 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 216 times more than Georgia	2,338 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 30 times more than Georgia	0.523 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 41 times more than Georgia	149.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 299 times more than Georgia	668 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	663,314 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 158 times more than Georgia	4,206 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	162,015 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 32 times more than Georgia	5,047 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	19,784 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Georgia	7,820 Terajoules Ranked 6th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 5 times more than Georgia	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 10 times more than Georgia	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	453,203 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 48 times more than Georgia	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Georgia	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	2.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 176 times more than Georgia	0.013 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 10 times more than Georgia	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 75 times more than Georgia	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8.27 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 14434 times more than Georgia	573 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	11.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 2% more than Georgia	11.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	7.17 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 13894 times more than Georgia	516 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.21 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 143 times more than Georgia	15,521 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 20 times more than Georgia	3.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Proved > Reserves	1.75 trillion cu m Ranked 21st. 206 times more than Georgia	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.03 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 6 times more than Georgia	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-8,805.088 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	64.75 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	20.01 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 11 times more than Georgia	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.48 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 21 times more than Georgia	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	26.02 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 26 times more than Georgia	0.99 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 22 times more than Georgia	0.996 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	694,103 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 156 times more than Georgia	4,458 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 27 times more than Georgia	0.965 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.17 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 111 times more than Georgia	10,536 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Georgia	2.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	840,678 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 195 times more than Georgia	4,317 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Georgia	1.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 41 times more than Georgia	149.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 299 times more than Georgia	668 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	612.53 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd.	1,495.09 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Flared and vented	73,696 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 1293 times more than Georgia	57 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 75 times more than Georgia	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.
Including LNG > Imports	364,396 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 7 times more than Georgia	49,532 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,972.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 28 times more than Georgia	69.77 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Total resources	63.72 million Terajoules Ranked 19th. 204 times more than Georgia	312,168 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd.	-792,610,886,109.614 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	75,200 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 677 times more than Georgia	111 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	15.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 29 times more than Georgia	0.536 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 40 times more than Georgia	153.16 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	612.28 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.	1,592.31 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	11.53 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 5 times more than Georgia	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Proved reserves per capita	55,831.64 cu m Ranked 22nd. 30 times more than Georgia	1,864.61 cu m Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 11 times more than Georgia	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Georgia	0.793 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Georgia in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Georgia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Georgia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Georgia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation