×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Kyrgyzstan

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Canada Kyrgyzstan HISTORY
Consumption 103.3 billion cu m
Ranked 5th. 223 times more than Kyrgyzstan
462.5 million cu m
Ranked 77th.

Consumption > Per capita 2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 7th. 20 times more than Kyrgyzstan
140,007.16 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 31st.

Consumption per capita 2,805.47 cu m
Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Kyrgyzstan
141.01 cu m
Ranked 30th.

Imports 31.31 billion cu m
Ranked 18th. 80 times more than Kyrgyzstan
390 million cu m
Ranked 60th.

Imports per capita 491.89 cu m
Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Kyrgyzstan
135.37 cu m
Ranked 9th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 372,423 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 21 times more than Kyrgyzstan
17,991 Terajoules
Ranked 78th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 116.12 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 21 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.56 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Exports per 1000 125.83 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 1396 times more than Kyrgyzstan
0.0901 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 255.96 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 1355 times more than Kyrgyzstan
0.189 Terajoules
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 116.12 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 21 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.56 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 68.46 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 33 times more than Kyrgyzstan
2.08 Terajoules
Ranked 69th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 1.97 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 43 times more than Kyrgyzstan
0.0454 Terajoules
Ranked 73th.

Production None None
Proved > Reserves per capita 51,396.94 cu m
Ranked 25th. 49 times more than Kyrgyzstan
1,039.48 cu m
Ranked 72nd.

Proved reserves 1.93 trillion cu m
Ranked 17th. 341 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.66 billion cu m
Ranked 86th.

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 221.87 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 1175 times more than Kyrgyzstan
0.189 Terajoules
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 36.25 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Kyrgyzstan
2.08 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.

Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2004 est.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000 11.28 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 2 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.37 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 504,864 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 47 times more than Kyrgyzstan
10,731 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Kyrgyzstan
2.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Kyrgyzstan
3.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 63th.

Including LNG > Exports 4.07 million Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 9990 times more than Kyrgyzstan
407 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th. 21 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 453,203 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 25 times more than Kyrgyzstan
17,991 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Kyrgyzstan
3.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 65th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th. 21 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 3.75 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 131 times more than Kyrgyzstan
28,722 Terajoules
Ranked 86th.

Including LNG > Imports 364,396 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Kyrgyzstan
27,747 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.

Including LNG > Exports > Per capita 125.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th. 1399 times more than Kyrgyzstan
0.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 1,972.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th. 43 times more than Kyrgyzstan
45.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 75th.

Including LNG > Total resources 63.72 million Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 272 times more than Kyrgyzstan
234,126 Terajoules
Ranked 85th.

Proved > Reserves 1.75 trillion cu m
Ranked 21st. 310 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.66 billion cu m
Ranked 85th.

Proved reserves per capita 55,831.64 cu m
Ranked 22nd. 55 times more than Kyrgyzstan
1,020.72 cu m
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 1.17 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 109 times more than Kyrgyzstan
10,731 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 17 times more than Kyrgyzstan
2.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 3.75 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 131 times more than Kyrgyzstan
28,722 Terajoules
Ranked 86th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production 8.27 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 8483 times more than Kyrgyzstan
975 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 11.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 32nd. 2 times more than Kyrgyzstan
5.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Net > Production 7.17 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 7353 times more than Kyrgyzstan
975 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.

Including LNG > Net inland availability 2.21 million Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 206 times more than Kyrgyzstan
10,731 Terajoules
Ranked 78th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th. 33 times more than Kyrgyzstan
2.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 70th.

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 3rd. 450 times more than Kyrgyzstan
15.87 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 14.03 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Kyrgyzstan
3.48 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 15.62 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Kyrgyzstan
2.08 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 11.53 Terajoules
Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Kyrgyzstan
3.48 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×