×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Latvia

Definitions

STAT Canada Latvia HISTORY
Consumption 103.3 billion cu m
Ranked 5th. 68 times more than Latvia
1.52 billion cu m
Ranked 63th.

Consumption > Per capita 2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Latvia
902,730.76 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.

Consumption per capita 2,805.47 cu m
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Latvia
677.21 cu m
Ranked 35th.

Imports 31.31 billion cu m
Ranked 18th. 20 times more than Latvia
1.58 billion cu m
Ranked 50th.

Imports per capita 491.89 cu m
Ranked 24th.
773.01 cu m
Ranked 14th. 57% more than Canada

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 102,164 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 211 times more than Latvia
485 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 3.16 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Latvia
0.211 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households 646,600 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 139 times more than Latvia
4,659 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Latvia
3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 37th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 6,189.65 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 190 times more than Latvia
32.6 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 372,423 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 15 times more than Latvia
25,156 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 116.12 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Latvia
27.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 68.46 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia
10.27 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.

Production None None
Proved reserves 1.93 trillion cu m
Ranked 17th.
0.0
Ranked 127th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 116.12 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Latvia
27.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 36.25 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 8 times more than Latvia
4.28 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.

Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000 11.28 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.
29 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Canada

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Latvia
0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 17% more than Latvia
1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 504,864 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 116 times more than Latvia
4,360 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Latvia
1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 2nd. 190 times more than Latvia
32.6 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 32nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation 200,000 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 2667 times more than Latvia
75 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 663,314 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 77 times more than Latvia
8,646 Terajoules
Ranked 69th.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants 54,387 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Latvia
13,230 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 19,784 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 24 times more than Latvia
820 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th.
5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Canada

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th. 5% more than Latvia
10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 41st.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 3.75 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 59 times more than Latvia
63,169 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Imports 364,396 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Latvia
66,710 Terajoules
Ranked 40th.

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 3rd. 33 times more than Latvia
214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 14th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 14.03 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
16.69 Terajoules
Ranked 29th. 19% more than Canada

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 15.62 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Latvia
1.9 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million 6,189.65 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 190 times more than Latvia
32.6 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 612.28 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 72% more than Latvia
356.44 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 11.53 Terajoules
Ranked 39th. 5% more than Latvia
10.93 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.

Proved reserves per capita 55,831.64 cu m
Ranked 22nd.
0.0
Ranked 127th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million -8,805.088 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
1,539.22 Terajoules
Ranked 4th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 20.01 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 10 times more than Latvia
2.03 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 21.48 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 51 times more than Latvia
0.421 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 26.02 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Latvia
5.96 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 2.33 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 17% more than Latvia
1.99 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 20.53 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Latvia
3.76 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 51 times more than Latvia
0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 51st.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 694,103 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 716 times more than Latvia
969 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Latvia
5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 1.17 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 119 times more than Latvia
9,839 Terajoules
Ranked 54th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Latvia
4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 840,678 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 61 times more than Latvia
13,714 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 2nd. 190 times more than Latvia
32.6 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 38th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 200,000 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 2667 times more than Latvia
75 Terajoules
Ranked 43th.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 612.53 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 3rd. 72% more than Latvia
356.44 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 8th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Latvia
27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 453,203 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Latvia
38,386 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 36th.
16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 29th. 19% more than Canada

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Latvia
27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 3.75 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 59 times more than Latvia
63,169 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 11.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 32nd.
29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Canada

Including LNG > Net inland availability 2.21 million Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 94 times more than Latvia
23,628 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia
10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 75,200 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 16 times more than Latvia
4,583 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 1.68 Terajoules
Ranked 18th.
5.75 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Canada

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th. 10 times more than Latvia
2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks -284,510 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
3,541 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×