Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Lithuania

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Lithuania
Consumption	103.3 billion cu m Ranked 5th. 31 times more than Lithuania	3.3 billion cu m Ranked 6th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Lithuania	990,125.39 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.
Consumption per capita	2,805.47 cu m Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Lithuania	1,051.18 cu m Ranked 12th.
Imports	31.31 billion cu m Ranked 18th. 9 times more than Lithuania	3.4 billion cu m Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	102,164 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 46 times more than Lithuania	2,243 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	646,600 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 103 times more than Lithuania	6,255 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 146 times more than Lithuania	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	638,219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 212740 times more than Lithuania	3 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	504,864 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 215 times more than Lithuania	2,353 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 23 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 279 times more than Lithuania	718 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 29 times more than Lithuania	210.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	1.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 177 times more than Lithuania	0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	1.93 trillion cu m Ranked 17th.	0.0 Ranked 159th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	51,445 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 1660 times more than Lithuania	31 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	663,314 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 59 times more than Lithuania	11,177 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	162,015 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 6 times more than Lithuania	26,986 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	453,203 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Lithuania	63,482 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	18.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 33% more than Canada
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 33 times more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd.	-326,290,864,583.469 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	75,200 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 1343 times more than Lithuania	56 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.8 Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Lithuania	0.902 Ranked 30th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	89.5 Ranked 4th. 29 times more than Lithuania	3.1 Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.6 Ranked 4th. 29 times more than Lithuania	0.3 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	4.37 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 11 times more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	11.28 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	33.96 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Lithuania	0.657 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 142 times more than Lithuania	0.0164 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	19.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 22480 times more than Lithuania	0.000879 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	20.53 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Lithuania	3.27 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	68.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 10 times more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	51,396.94 cu m Ranked 25th.	0.0 Ranked 147th.
Imports per capita	491.89 cu m Ranked 24th.	1,051.18 cu m Ranked 2nd. 2 times more than Canada
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 28 times more than Lithuania	0.12 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Lithuania	3.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	372,423 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 8 times more than Lithuania	48,561 Terajoules Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Lithuania	0.657 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	1.59 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 175 times more than Lithuania	0.00908 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 29 times more than Lithuania	210.29 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.01 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	7.9 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 58% more than Canada
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.52 Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Lithuania	0.815 Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.25 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 12 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	80.5 Ranked 4th. 29 times more than Lithuania	2.8 Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-284,510 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	744 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 512 times more than Lithuania	0.042 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	694,103 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 4820 times more than Lithuania	144 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Lithuania	3.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.17 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 118 times more than Lithuania	9,932 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 12 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	840,678 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 62 times more than Lithuania	13,476 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.	7.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 58% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 29 times more than Lithuania	210.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 279 times more than Lithuania	718 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	612.53 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 58% more than Lithuania	387.78 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	54,387 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Lithuania	14,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	19,784 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 15 times more than Lithuania	1,324 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.	4.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 23% more than Canada
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 33 times more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Imports	364,396 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Lithuania	115,949 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	11.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	33.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.21 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 92 times more than Lithuania	24,126 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 10 times more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.
Proved > Reserves	1.75 trillion cu m Ranked 21st.	0.0 Ranked 155th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 28 times more than Lithuania	0.12 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.03 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	18.59 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 33% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	15.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 23 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 29 times more than Lithuania	210.29 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	612.28 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 58% more than Lithuania	387.78 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	11.53 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	14.22 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 23% more than Canada
Proved reserves per capita	55,831.64 cu m Ranked 22nd.	0.0 Ranked 159th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-8,805.088 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	217.91 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	20.01 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 11 times more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.48 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 509 times more than Lithuania	0.0422 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	26.02 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Lithuania	3.95 Terajoules Ranked 43th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Lithuania in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Lithuania

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Lithuania in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Lithuania in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation