|
Consumption by industry and construction
>
Per capita
|
0.826 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th.
|
1.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
97% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
|
26,684 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
|
37,308 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
40% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
>
Per capita
|
0.826 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th.
|
1.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 2nd.
97% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
|
2,820 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.
|
7,181 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
3 times more
than
Canada
|
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
>
Per capita
|
0.087 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th.
|
0.314 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
4 times more
than
Canada
|
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
|
2,820 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.
|
7,181 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
3 times more
than
Canada
|
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
>
Per capita
|
0.087 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th.
|
0.314 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
4 times more
than
Canada
|
|
|
Gross inland availability
|
29,504 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
|
44,489 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
51% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Gross inland availability
>
Per capita
|
0.913 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
|
1.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
2 times more
than
Canada
|
|
|
Net inland availability
|
26,684 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
37,308 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
40% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Net inland availability
>
Per capita
|
0.826 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th.
|
1.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
97% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Production
|
29,504 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
|
44,489 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
51% more than
Canada
|
|
|
Production
>
Per capita
|
0.913 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
|
1.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
2 times more
than
Canada
|
|