×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Chile & Mexico

Definitions

STAT Chile Mexico HISTORY
Consumption 5.3 billion cu m
Ranked 40th.
59.15 billion cu m
Ranked 11th. 11 times more than Chile

Consumption > Per capita 142,213.42 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th.
628,237.72 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 45th. 4 times more than Chile

Consumption per capita 139.03 cu m
Ranked 31st.
513.65 cu m
Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Chile

Imports 3.83 billion cu m
Ranked 26th.
17.24 billion cu m
Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 430 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
123,324 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 287 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households 16,074 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
39,931 Terajoules
Ranked 30th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 0.058 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th.
1.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th. 23 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
417,759 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 3,598 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
9,497 Terajoules
Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.221 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 2 times more than Mexico
0.092 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 58th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 70.02 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 27th.
328.68 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Chile

Production None None
Proved reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
487.7 billion cu m
Ranked 29th. 5 times more than Chile

Reserves 67.78 billion cubic feet
Ranked 41st.
969.2 billion cubic feet
Ranked 18th. 14 times more than Chile
Reserves per capita 4,148.67 cubic feet
Ranked 38th.
8,752.68 cubic feet
Ranked 29th. 2 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation 1,129 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
33,883 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 30 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 40,646 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
201,557 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 7.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
8.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th. 5% more than Chile

Including LNG > Flared and vented 2,794 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
65,863 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 24 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
2.06 million Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 6 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita 0.286 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st.
3.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports 245,644 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
348,548 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 42% more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports > Per capita 0.039 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 30th.
0.095 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 37th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage 4,668 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.
273,523 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 59 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 234.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 50% more than Mexico
155.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 58th.

Including LNG > Total resources 3.82 million Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
16.08 million Terajoules
Ranked 37th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 5.78 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 4th. 10 times more than Mexico
568.06 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 9th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 939 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
140,261 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 149 times more than Chile

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.507
Ranked 40th. 15% more than Mexico
0.441
Ranked 42nd.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 8.2
Ranked 44th.
48.2
Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Chile
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 0.8
Ranked 44th.
4.6
Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.22 Terajoules
Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Mexico
0.0858 Terajoules
Ranked 56th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million 69.83 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
305.99 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 7.72 Terajoules
Ranked 49th. 2% more than Mexico
7.55 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000 0.286 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
3.05 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Chile

Proved reserves per capita 5,690.32 cu m
Ranked 49th. 36% more than Mexico
4,196.32 cu m
Ranked 56th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.986 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Mexico
0.387 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.026 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
1.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 46 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 0.0575 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
1.27 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 22 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
3.77 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 2.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 37% more than Mexico
1.82 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.

Including LNG > Exports per 1000 0.0389 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
0.0888 Terajoules
Ranked 37th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 6% more than Mexico
18.57 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 4 Terajoules
Ranked 54th.
4.95 Terajoules
Ranked 53th. 24% more than Chile

Proved > Reserves per capita 5,712.28 cu m
Ranked 47th. 87% more than Mexico
3,051.24 cu m
Ranked 57th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.234 Terajoules
Ranked 51st. 61% more than Mexico
0.145 Terajoules
Ranked 57th.

Imports per capita 41 cu m
Ranked 15th.
101.7 cu m
Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.3
Ranked 44th.
1.79
Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 2.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th. 28% more than Mexico
1.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 126,127 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.
835,810 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.0263 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
1.11 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 42 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 88.57 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
305.99 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 6% more than Mexico
18.57 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 5.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
16.1 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 5.03 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
15.5 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 3 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.458
Ranked 40th. 16% more than Mexico
0.396
Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 1.34 Terajoules
Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Mexico
0.446 Terajoules
Ranked 59th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 7.4
Ranked 44th.
43.3
Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Chile
Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2004 est.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000 0.171 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.
0.595 Terajoules
Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 15.04 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Mexico
3.15 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks 7,470 Terajoules
Ranked 7th.
-958 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 1.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th.
5.05 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 37th.
520,680 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 19 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th.
4.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th. 75% more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 21,823 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
49,428 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 1.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Mexico
0.479 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 61st.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 42,015 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
465,142 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 11 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 88.8 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 31st.
328.68 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 1,447 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
33,883 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 23 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports 587 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
9,832 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 17 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th.
19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 1% more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 134,262 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
835,810 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 8.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 2% more than Mexico
8.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th.

Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita 0.171 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.
0.639 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th.
19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 1% more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
2.06 million Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 6 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross > Production 89,716 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
1.78 million Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 20 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 15.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Mexico
3.38 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Net > Production 82,254 Terajoules
Ranked 55th.
1.72 million Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 21 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability 65,285 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
548,453 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th.
5.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th. 33% more than Chile

Proved > Reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
359.7 billion cu m
Ranked 37th. 4 times more than Chile

Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.3
Ranked 44th.
1.79
Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 8.22 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 9% more than Mexico
7.55 Terajoules
Ranked 55th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 457.22 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
-8.652 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.984 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Mexico
0.361 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
4.7 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 2.57 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
4.2 Terajoules
Ranked 41st. 63% more than Chile

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×