×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Chile & Poland

Definitions

STAT Chile Poland HISTORY
Consumption 5.3 billion cu m
Ranked 40th.
14.38 billion cu m
Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Chile

Consumption > Per capita 142,213.42 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th.
425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st. 3 times more than Chile

Consumption per capita 139.03 cu m
Ranked 31st.
428.03 cu m
Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Chile

Imports 3.83 billion cu m
Ranked 26th.
37.38 billion cu m
Ranked 13th. 10 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 430 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
9,004 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 21 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households 16,074 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
150,123 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 9 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 8 times more than Poland
0.2 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 2.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
2.58 Terajoules
Ranked 46th. 4% more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports per 1000 0.0389 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
0.0437 Terajoules
Ranked 39th. 12% more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 32% more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 4 Terajoules
Ranked 54th.
9.69 Terajoules
Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Chile

Production None None
Proved reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st. 6% more than Poland
92 billion cu m
Ranked 53th.

Reserves 67.78 billion cubic feet
Ranked 41st.
154.4 billion cubic feet
Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Chile
Reserves per capita 4,148.67 cubic feet
Ranked 38th. 3% more than Poland
4,045.54 cubic feet
Ranked 39th.
Proved > Reserves per capita 5,712.28 cu m
Ranked 47th. 32% more than Poland
4,315.98 cu m
Ranked 55th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.234 Terajoules
Ranked 51st. 3 times more than Poland
0.0767 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.

Imports per capita 41 cu m
Ranked 15th.
260.91 cu m
Ranked 32nd. 6 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.3
Ranked 44th.
0.49
Ranked 36th. 63% more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 2.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th.
2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th. 3% more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 126,127 Terajoules
Ranked 45th. 3 times more than Poland
49,729 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.0263 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
0.236 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 9 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 88.57 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
287.22 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 32% more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 5.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 16% more than Poland
4.73 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 5.03 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 6% more than Poland
4.73 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.458
Ranked 40th. 47% more than Poland
0.312
Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 1.34 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.
6.01 Terajoules
Ranked 29th. 4 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 7.4
Ranked 44th.
11.9
Ranked 36th. 61% more than Chile
Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks 7,470 Terajoules
Ranked 7th.
8,431 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 13% more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.026 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th. 9 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Poland
7,618 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 0.058 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th.
0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 10 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 3,598 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
78,027 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 22 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.221 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd. 9 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 70.02 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 27th.
287.22 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation 1,129 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
10,962 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 10 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 40,646 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
98,333 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 88.8 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 31st.
287.22 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 1,447 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
10,962 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 132 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Poland
31.55 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 29th.

Including LNG > Exports 587 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
1,667 Terajoules
Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th. 32% more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 134,262 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Poland
63,897 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 8.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Poland
1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th. 32% more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
569,149 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 78% more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross > Production 89,716 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
180,700 Terajoules
Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 15.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th. 44% more than Poland
10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Net > Production 82,254 Terajoules
Ranked 55th.
180,700 Terajoules
Ranked 45th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability 65,285 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
369,865 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 6 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th.
9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 234.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 3 times more than Poland
76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 68th.

Including LNG > Total resources 3.82 million Terajoules
Ranked 53th. 31% more than Poland
2.93 million Terajoules
Ranked 58th.

Proved > Reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
164.8 billion cu m
Ranked 47th. 68% more than Chile

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.507
Ranked 40th. 47% more than Poland
0.346
Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 8.2
Ranked 44th.
13.2
Ranked 36th. 61% more than Chile
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.3
Ranked 44th.
0.49
Ranked 36th. 63% more than Chile
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 0.498 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 39% more than Poland
0.358 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.

Proved reserves per capita 5,690.32 cu m
Ranked 49th. 2 times more than Poland
2,396.84 cu m
Ranked 62nd.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 457.22 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Poland
220.91 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.984 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.
3.93 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 76% more than Poland
0.928 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 2.57 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
3.39 Terajoules
Ranked 47th. 32% more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 0.0575 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
0.582 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 10 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 1.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th. 77% more than Poland
0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 37th.
35,420 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 33% more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th.
3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th. 32% more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 21,823 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
229,354 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 11 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 1.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th.
6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 29th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 42,015 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
129,549 Terajoules
Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants 8,135 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
13,647 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 68% more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 2,151 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 79% more than Poland
1,204 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 0.499 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 39% more than Poland
0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 7.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 6 times more than Poland
1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
569,149 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 78% more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports 245,644 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
398,547 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 62% more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports > Per capita 0.039 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 30th.
0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 39th. 13% more than Chile

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 5.78 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 4th.
-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 939 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
22,212 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 24 times more than Chile

Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 0.8
Ranked 44th.
1.3
Ranked 36th. 63% more than Chile
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 8.22 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Poland
1.67 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.22 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
2.04 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 9 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million 69.83 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
287.22 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 131.66 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Poland
31.55 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 7.72 Terajoules
Ranked 49th. 6 times more than Poland
1.3 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.986 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.
3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 15.04 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 44% more than Poland
10.44 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×