×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Chile & United States

Definitions

STAT Chile United States HISTORY
Consumption 5.3 billion cu m
Ranked 40th.
689.9 billion cu m
Ranked 1st. 130 times more than Chile

Consumption > Per capita 142,213.42 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th.
2.17 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 11th. 15 times more than Chile

Consumption per capita 139.03 cu m
Ranked 31st.
2,107.76 cu m
Ranked 7th. 15 times more than Chile

Imports 3.83 billion cu m
Ranked 26th.
88.77 billion cu m
Ranked 2nd. 23 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 430 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
1.91 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 4453 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households 16,074 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
5.22 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 325 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 0.0575 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
1.46 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 25 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
4.08 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 2.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
9.39 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports per 1000 0.0389 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
2.63 Terajoules
Ranked 30th. 67 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.
81.05 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 4 Terajoules
Ranked 54th.
48.43 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 12 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Re-injected per 1000 0.0124 Terajoules
Ranked 19th.
13.86 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 1121 times more than Chile

Production None None
Proved reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
9.46 trillion cu m
Ranked 5th. 97 times more than Chile

Proved > Reserves per capita 5,712.28 cu m
Ranked 47th.
22,397.07 cu m
Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.234 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
0.775 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Chile

Imports per capita 41 cu m
Ranked 15th.
345.86 cu m
Ranked 28th. 8 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.3
Ranked 44th.
24.05
Ranked 1st. 80 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 2.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th.
9.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 126,127 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.
7.19 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 57 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.0263 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
6.48 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 246 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 88.57 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
2,230.22 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 25 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.
81.05 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 5.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
85.16 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 16 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 5.03 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
67.58 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 13 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.458
Ranked 40th.
1.99
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 1.34 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.
28.88 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 22 times more than Chile

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 7.4
Ranked 44th.
582
Ranked 1st. 79 times more than Chile
Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
1.21 million Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 45 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 0.058 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th.
1.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 25 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 3,598 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
3.32 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 921 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.221 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th. 51 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 70.02 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 27th.
2,223.49 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 7th. 32 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation 1,129 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
659,066 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 584 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 40,646 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
2.77 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 68 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants 8,135 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
57,508 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 0.499 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 2 times more than United States
0.206 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 7.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
24.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports 587 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
776,615 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 1323 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th.
80.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 134,262 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
7.19 million Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 54 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 8.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
24.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita 0.171 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.
0.444 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th.
80.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
23.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 75 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross > Production 89,716 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
25.17 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 281 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 15.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th.
15.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 5% more than Chile

Including LNG > Net > Production 82,254 Terajoules
Ranked 55th.
19.97 million Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 243 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability 65,285 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
14.31 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 219 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th.
48.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 12 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Re-injected > Per capita 0.012 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th.
13.82 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 1152 times more than Chile

Proved > Reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
6.93 trillion cu m
Ranked 6th. 71 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 939 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
430,902 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 459 times more than Chile

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.507
Ranked 40th.
2.21
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Chile
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 8.2
Ranked 44th.
646.7
Ranked 1st. 79 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 8.22 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.
24.35 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.22 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
11.22 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 51 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million 69.83 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
2,230.22 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 32 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 7.72 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.
24.35 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000 0.286 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
3.28 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 11 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 457.22 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
-223.064 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.984 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.
17.66 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 18 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
6.59 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 2.57 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
17.32 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 7 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.026 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
6.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th. 248 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 1.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th.
6.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 37th.
1.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 73 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th.
17.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 21,823 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
8.53 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 391 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 1.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th.
28.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 22 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 42,015 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
5.12 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 122 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 88.8 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 31st.
2,223.49 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 7th. 25 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 1,447 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
659,066 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 455 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Flared and vented 2,794 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
131,593 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 47 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
23.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 75 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita 0.286 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st.
3.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th. 11 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports 245,644 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
4.69 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 19 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Exports > Per capita 0.039 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 30th.
2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 30th. 67 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage 4,668 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.
968,461 Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 207 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Re-injected 200 Terajoules
Ranked 19th.
4.1 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 20482 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 234.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
772.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Total resources 3.82 million Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
228.9 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 60 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 5.78 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 4th.
-640,962,665,277.601 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 42nd.

Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 0.8
Ranked 44th.
62.4
Ranked 1st. 78 times more than Chile
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.3
Ranked 44th.
24.05
Ranked 1st. 80 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 0.498 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 2 times more than United States
0.206 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.

Proved reserves per capita 5,690.32 cu m
Ranked 49th.
30,132.45 cu m
Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.986 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.
17.6 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 18 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000 0.171 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.
0.445 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 15.04 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
15.88 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 6% more than Chile

Including LNG > Changes in stocks 7,470 Terajoules
Ranked 7th.
-65,919 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×