Energy > Coke Oven Gas Stats: compare key data on China & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	China	Poland	HISTORY
Consumption by coke ovens	79,006 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Poland	36,263 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by coke ovens per million	60.6 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	950.15 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 16 times more than China
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.443 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 9% more than Poland	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	577,678 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 351 times more than Poland	1,644 Terajoules Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.443 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 10 times more than Poland	0.043 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	5,872 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 4 times more than Poland	1,526 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	4.62 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	39.98 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 9 times more than China
Conversion in thermal power plants	94,876 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Poland	14,673 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.073 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	0.418 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than China
Gross inland availability	861,012 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 13 times more than Poland	68,830 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	0.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	1.8 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 3 times more than China
Net inland availability	668,272 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 43 times more than Poland	15,537 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	0.512 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 26% more than Poland	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th.
Production > Per capita	0.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	1.8 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 3 times more than China
Statistical differences > Per capita	2.35 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd.	-38,621,318,496.178 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 11th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.073 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	0.384 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than China
Conversion to other forms of energy	94,876 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Poland	15,970 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per million	443.1 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 10 times more than Poland	43.08 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per million	72.77 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	384.46 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than China
Gross inland availability per million	660.43 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	1,803.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 3 times more than China
Conversion to other forms of energy per million	72.77 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	418.44 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than China
Production per million	660.43 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	1,803.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 3 times more than China
Net inland availability per million	512.59 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 26% more than Poland	407.1 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Production	861,012 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 13 times more than Poland	68,830 Terajoules Ranked 7th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation