Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Japan

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Denmark	Japan
Consumption	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th.	112.6 billion cu m Ranked 4th. 27 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Per capita	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th. 6% more than Japan	787,077.22 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.
Consumption per capita	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th. 8% more than Japan	742.17 cu m Ranked 30th.
Imports	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.	122.2 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 481 times more than Denmark
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 98th.	707.84 cu m Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	35,348 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 9 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	435,726 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 47% more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 44% more than Japan	10.06 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.59 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 38 times more than Japan	0.0156 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	11,049.66 cu m Ranked 38th. 67 times more than Japan	163.99 cu m Ranked 85th.
Proved reserves	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th. 2 times more than Japan	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 73th.
Reserves	81.98 billion cubic feet Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Japan	20.02 billion cubic feet Ranked 56th.
Reserves per capita	15,127.05 cubic feet Ranked 25th. 97 times more than Japan	156.68 cubic feet Ranked 66th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.2 Ranked 48th.	2.68 Ranked 8th. 13 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Japan	1.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	2.05 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 22 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Japan	0.277 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 47% more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 79 times more than Japan	1.04 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 77 times more than Japan	1.04 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.907 Ranked 26th. 78% more than Japan	0.508 Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 2% more than Japan	8.18 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	4.9 Ranked 48th.	64.9 Ranked 8th. 13 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	4,846 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	6,919 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 39% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Japan	0.277 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Japan	10,233 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	0.572 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	608,830 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 58 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	4.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	131,972 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.114 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd.	4.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 41 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	620 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.	576,318 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 930 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 47% more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 21 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 13% more than Japan	16.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 47% more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 16 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Gross > Production	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Japan	133,094 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Japan	133,094 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 8th. 16 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 44% more than Japan	10.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.	-1,045,783,962,308.45 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th. 60% more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	5.4 Ranked 48th.	72.2 Ranked 8th. 13 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Japan	55.37 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 7 times more than Japan	0.13 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	37.93 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 75% more than Japan	3.41 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 14 times more than Japan	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 3 times more than Japan	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	0.572 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 71 times more than Japan	0.0801 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Japan	1.03 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Japan	55.37 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 14 times more than Japan	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	52,067 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 69% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 3 times more than Japan	1.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	1.04 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 23 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 2% more than Japan	8.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	240,402 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	16,607 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 7 times more than Japan	0.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 7% more than Japan	16.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 16 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	590.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 38 times more than Japan	15.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Total resources	3.2 million Terajoules Ranked 57th. 61% more than Japan	1.99 million Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Proved > Reserves	61.3 billion cu m Ranked 60th. 3 times more than Japan	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	73,082 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 95 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.999 Ranked 28th. 77% more than Japan	0.565 Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.5 Ranked 48th.	7 Ranked 8th. 14 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.2 Ranked 48th.	2.68 Ranked 8th. 13 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 13% more than Japan	16.14 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	4.76 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	114.4 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.	4,639.16 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 41 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 7% more than Japan	16.01 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Proved reserves per capita	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st. 47 times more than Japan	164.24 cu m Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 75% more than Japan	3.41 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Denmark and Japan in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Japan

Definitions

Citation

Compare Denmark and Japan in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Denmark and Japan in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation