Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 8 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 7 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 95% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 3% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 14 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 40% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 40% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	24.36 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	80.85 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Denmark
Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 4 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 41% more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.
Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 32 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 3% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 95% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 2 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 29% more than Latvia	356.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption in agriculture	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Latvia	820 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Denmark
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 57% more than Latvia	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 9% more than Latvia	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 3 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 3 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 41% more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 9% more than Latvia	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Denmark
Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 14 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 2% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 3 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	132 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	186 Terajoules Ranked 37th. 41% more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 2% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption in agriculture per million	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 29% more than Latvia	356.44 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 57% more than Latvia	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation