×

Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Denmark Latvia HISTORY
Consumption by agriculture per million 366.27 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Latvia
67.38 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.

Consumption by chemical industry per million 167.73 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 55 times more than Latvia
3.04 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Consumption by households > Per capita 11.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 45% more than Latvia
7.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th.

Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 17.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 64% more than Latvia
10.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th.

Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 17.33 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 64% more than Latvia
10.58 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.

Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 1.27 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Latvia
0.297 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.

Consumption by iron and steel industry per million 42.62 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 25 times more than Latvia
1.74 Terajoules
Ranked 13th.

Consumption by other consumers 29,063 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Latvia
5,821 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.

Consumption by other consumers per 1000 5.36 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Latvia
2.53 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.

Consumption by other industries and construction 5,767 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 9 times more than Latvia
673 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.

Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 1.06 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Latvia
0.293 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.

Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000 4.13 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
7.16 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 73% more than Denmark

Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000 19.39 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Latvia
6.38 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.

Net inland availability > Per capita 18.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th. 71% more than Latvia
10.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th.

Station use and station loss per million 232.68 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
370.79 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 59% more than Denmark

Consumption by energy sector per million 65.32 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.
103.46 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 58% more than Denmark

Statistical differences > Per capita -3,138,860,608.369 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 9th. 26% more than Latvia
-2,489,626,556.016 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 8th.

Consumption by energy sector 354 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 49% more than Latvia
238 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.

Gross > Production > Per capita 23.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 74% more than Latvia
13.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.

Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita 4.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th.
7.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 73% more than Denmark

Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita 19.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Latvia
6.38 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th.

Gross > Production > Thermal power plants 105,072 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Latvia
14,677 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.

Consumption by chemical industry 909 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 130 times more than Latvia
7 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Consumption by agriculture 1,985 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 13 times more than Latvia
155 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.

Consumption by agriculture > Per capita 366.51 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Latvia
67.38 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 8th.

Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.168 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st. 56 times more than Latvia
0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th.

Consumption by industry and construction 6,907 Terajoules
Ranked 23th. 10 times more than Latvia
684 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.

Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 5.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Latvia
2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th.

Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 1.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Latvia
0.293 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th.

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 25,294 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Latvia
5,033 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita 4.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Latvia
2.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.

Gross inland availability > Per capita 23.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 77% more than Latvia
13.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.

Consumption by households and other consumers 93,917 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Latvia
24,336 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.

Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 1.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Latvia
0.297 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 31st.

Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 42.65 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 8th. 25 times more than Latvia
1.74 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 13th.

Gross inland availability 126,455 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Latvia
30,291 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.

Station use and station loss > Per capita 0.233 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
0.371 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd. 59% more than Denmark

Gross > Production > Pure heating plants 22,372 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 36% more than Latvia
16,467 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.

Consumption by households 62,869 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Latvia
18,360 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.

Consumption by iron and steel industry 231 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 58 times more than Latvia
4 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.

Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.065 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
0.103 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th. 58% more than Denmark

Net inland availability 100,824 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Latvia
25,020 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Gross inland availability per 1000 23.33 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 77% more than Latvia
13.17 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.

Net inland availability per 1000 18.6 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 71% more than Latvia
10.88 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.

Station use and station loss 1,261 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 48% more than Latvia
853 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000 4.67 Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Latvia
2.19 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.

Consumption by households per 1000 11.6 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 45% more than Latvia
7.98 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×