Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Lithuania

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Lithuania	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 77% more than Lithuania	2,243 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 214 times more than Lithuania	144 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 136 times more than Lithuania	0.042 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 5 times more than Lithuania	6,255 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Lithuania	9,932 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 2 times more than Lithuania	13,476 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 56% more than Lithuania	3.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 14 times more than Lithuania	56 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 19% more than Lithuania	387.78 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th.
Consumption in agriculture per million	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 19% more than Lithuania	387.78 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	132 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	467 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 78% more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th. Twice as much as Lithuania	-326,290,864,583.469 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 21% more than Lithuania	14.22 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	217.91 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 135 times more than Lithuania	0.0422 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 56% more than Lithuania	3.95 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 9 times more than Lithuania	0.0164 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 6486 times more than Lithuania	0.000879 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 61% more than Lithuania	3.27 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 12% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 61% more than Lithuania	3.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 92% more than Lithuania	48,561 Terajoules Ranked 65th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 12% more than Lithuania	0.657 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	24.36 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	136.78 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 6 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 12% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	744 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 12% more than Lithuania	0.657 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 10294 times more than Lithuania	3 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 9 times more than Lithuania	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Lithuania	2,353 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Lithuania	11,177 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	14,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption in agriculture	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 89% more than Lithuania	1,324 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	4.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Denmark
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 21% more than Lithuania	14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 12% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 55% more than Lithuania	63,482 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.	18.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 2% more than Denmark
Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 12% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 78% more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 3 times more than Lithuania	24,126 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	18.59 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 2% more than Denmark
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	4.37 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Denmark

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation