Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Lithuania

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Lithuania	HISTORY
Consumption by agriculture per million	366.27 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Lithuania	129.16 Terajoules Ranked 6th.
Consumption by chemical industry per million	167.73 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	1,488.15 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	17.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 93% more than Lithuania	8.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	17.33 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 93% more than Lithuania	8.97 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.27 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	2.13 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 67% more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry per million	42.62 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 74 times more than Lithuania	0.579 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	5.36 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Lithuania	2.32 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.06 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 65% more than Lithuania	0.645 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per million	65.32 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	396.27 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement per 1000	0.022 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 23% more than Lithuania	0.0179 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Gross > Production > Geothermal sources per 1000	0.022 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 23% more than Lithuania	0.0179 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000	4.13 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	5.19 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 26% more than Denmark
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000	19.39 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Lithuania	6.74 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	18.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 68% more than Lithuania	11.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Station use and station loss per million	232.68 Terajoules Ranked 6th.	355.86 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 53% more than Denmark
Consumption by households > Per capita	11.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 78% more than Lithuania	6.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Consumption by other consumers	29,063 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Lithuania	7,920 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by other industries and construction	5,767 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Lithuania	2,203 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by energy sector per million	65.32 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	413.55 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Denmark
Statistical differences > Per capita	-3,138,860,608.369 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 9th.	-33,974,753,243.709 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th. 11 times more than Denmark
Consumption by energy sector	354 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	1,412 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Denmark
Gross > Production > Per capita	23.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 62% more than Lithuania	14.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Gross > Production > Geothermal sources	119 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 95% more than Lithuania	61 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita	4.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th.	5.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 26% more than Denmark
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita	19.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Lithuania	6.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants	105,072 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Lithuania	23,028 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by chemical industry	909 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	5,081 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption by agriculture	1,985 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Lithuania	441 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Consumption by agriculture > Per capita	366.51 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Lithuania	129.16 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 6th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.168 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	1.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction	6,907 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	7,284 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 5% more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	5.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Lithuania	2.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 65% more than Lithuania	0.645 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.065 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.	0.396 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption by petroleum refineries	354 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	1,353 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Denmark
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	25,294 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Lithuania	7,458 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Energy balance requirement	119 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 95% more than Lithuania	61 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	21.97 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th. 23% more than Lithuania	17.87 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	4.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Lithuania	2.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	23.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 64% more than Lithuania	14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	93,917 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Lithuania	30,616 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	2.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 67% more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	42.65 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th. 74 times more than Lithuania	0.579 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 16th.
Gross inland availability	126,455 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Lithuania	48,569 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Station use and station loss > Per capita	0.233 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th.	0.356 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 53% more than Denmark
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants	22,372 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 26% more than Lithuania	17,727 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Consumption by households	62,869 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Lithuania	22,255 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	231 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 116 times more than Lithuania	2 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.065 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th.	0.414 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability	100,824 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Lithuania	37,900 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	23.33 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 64% more than Lithuania	14.23 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability per 1000	18.6 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 68% more than Lithuania	11.1 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Station use and station loss	1,261 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 4% more than Lithuania	1,215 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	4.67 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Lithuania	2.18 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Consumption by households per 1000	11.6 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 78% more than Lithuania	6.52 Terajoules Ranked 9th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation