Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Poland

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Denmark	Poland
Consumption	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th.	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Per capita	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th. 96% more than Poland	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Consumption per capita	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th. 87% more than Poland	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st.
Imports	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th. 147 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th.	-233.755 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 2 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Denmark
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	0.9 Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Poland	0.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	9.4 Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Poland	4.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.35 Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	1.74 Ranked 19th. 15 times more than Poland	0.115 Ranked 42nd.
Proved reserves	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th.	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th. 2 times more than Denmark
Reserves	81.98 billion cubic feet Ranked 38th.	154.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 31st. 88% more than Denmark
Reserves per capita	15,127.05 cubic feet Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Poland	4,045.54 cubic feet Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	-8,990 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 4 times more than Poland	7,618 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 7 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 6% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	132 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	7,120 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 54 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	43.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 978 times more than Poland	0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	590.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 8 times more than Poland	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Total resources	3.2 million Terajoules Ranked 57th. 9% more than Poland	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th. 25 times more than Poland	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 29 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	5.4 Ranked 48th.	13.2 Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.5 Ranked 48th.	1.3 Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 11 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.57 Ranked 19th. 15 times more than Poland	0.102 Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 6% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	114.4 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 36 times more than Poland	3.19 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 13 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 52% more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	8.5 Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Poland	3.9 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 29 times more than Poland	0.2 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 2 times more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	43.01 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 985 times more than Poland	0.0437 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 50% more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	11,049.66 cu m Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Poland	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.59 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 8 times more than Poland	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 98th.	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.2 Ranked 48th.	0.49 Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 2 times more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 87% more than Poland	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	24.36 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	186.56 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 8 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 17 times more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 17 times more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.907 Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Poland	0.312 Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 39% more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	4.9 Ranked 48th.	11.9 Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.35 Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	8,431 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 6 times more than Poland	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 15% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 81% more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 39% more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.114 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 38 times more than Poland	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	620 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 5 times more than Poland	123 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	13,647 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 2 times more than Poland	1,204 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Poland	0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 13 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Exports	233,085 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 140 times more than Poland	1,667 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 54% more than Poland	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 11 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Gross > Production	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 2 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 50% more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Proved > Reserves	61.3 billion cu m Ranked 60th.	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.999 Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Poland	0.346 Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.2 Ranked 48th.	0.49 Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Poland	0.358 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th.	-233.741 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Proved reserves per capita	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Poland	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	220.91 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 51% more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Poland	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 81% more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Denmark

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Denmark and Poland in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Poland

Definitions

Citation

Compare Denmark and Poland in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Denmark and Poland in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation