Energy > Peat > For fuel use Stats: compare key data on Finland & Lithuania

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Finland	Lithuania	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	1.96 million ton Ranked 1st. 98 times more than Lithuania	20,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	373.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 64 times more than Lithuania	5.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Changes in stocks per million	373,229.92 ton Ranked 1st. 64 times more than Lithuania	5,857.71 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption by households	52,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Lithuania	21,000 ton Ranked 4th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	106,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Lithuania	23,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	20.21 ton Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Lithuania	6.74 ton Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by households per 1000	9.91 ton Ranked 2nd. 61% more than Lithuania	6.15 ton Ranked 3rd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1,080.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 142 times more than Lithuania	7.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1,080.61 ton Ranked 1st. 142 times more than Lithuania	7.62 ton Ranked 7th.
Energy balance requirement	6.74 million ton Ranked 1st. 135 times more than Lithuania	50,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Exports	40,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than Lithuania	5,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	1,284.57 ton Ranked 1st. 88 times more than Lithuania	14.64 ton Ranked 6th.
Net inland availability per 1000	203.96 ton Ranked 1st. 30 times more than Lithuania	6.74 ton Ranked 5th.
Production per 1000	1,665.43 ton Ranked 1st. 81 times more than Lithuania	20.5 ton Ranked 6th.
Recoverable per capita	81.71 ton Ranked 2nd. 7% more than Lithuania	76.33 ton Ranked 2nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	20.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Lithuania	6.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	9.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 61% more than Lithuania	6.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	5.67 million ton Ranked 1st. 218 times more than Lithuania	26,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1,284.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 88 times more than Lithuania	14.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Exports > Per capita	7.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 5 times more than Lithuania	1.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	1,284.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 88 times more than Lithuania	14.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Gross inland availability	6.74 million ton Ranked 1st. 135 times more than Lithuania	50,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Net inland availability	1.07 million ton Ranked 1st. 47 times more than Lithuania	23,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	203.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 30 times more than Lithuania	6.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	0.354 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 7th.	283.21 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 3rd. 800016640346 times more than Finland
Production	8.74 million ton Ranked 1st. 125 times more than Lithuania	70,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Recoverable	420 million ton Ranked 5th. 56% more than Lithuania	269 million ton Ranked 3rd.
Recoverable > Per capita	81.72 ton per capita Ranked 2nd. 7% more than Lithuania	76.18 ton per capita Ranked 2nd.
Production > Per capita	1,665.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 81 times more than Lithuania	20.5 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	1,284.57 ton Ranked 1st. 88 times more than Lithuania	14.64 ton Ranked 6th.
Exports per 1000	7.62 ton Ranked 1st. 5 times more than Lithuania	1.46 ton Ranked 4th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation