Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Finland & Norway

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Finland	Norway
Consumption	4.1 billion cu m Ranked 40th.	4.81 billion cu m Ranked 36th. 17% more than Finland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.16 Ranked 50th.	0.17 Ranked 49th. 6% more than Finland
Consumption > Per capita	874,493.65 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	1.4 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 61% more than Finland
Consumption per capita	803.35 cu m Ranked 26th.	956.77 cu m Ranked 24th. 19% more than Finland
Imports	3.66 billion cu m Ranked 27th.	0.0 Ranked 177th.
Imports per capita	803.35 cu m Ranked 13th.	0.0 Ranked 118th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	1,507 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	4,668 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households	1,352 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 6 times more than Norway	240 Terajoules Ranked 61st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.55 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	31.91 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 62% more than Finland
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	7.21 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	0.0 Ranked 172nd.	473,078.5 cu m Ranked 6th.
Proved reserves	0.0 Ranked 186th.	2.07 trillion cu m Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	102,017 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 48 times more than Norway	2,142 Terajoules Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.287 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	1.01 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	182.99 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 78% more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.465 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	5.23 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 11 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	31.91 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 62% more than Finland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.746 Ranked 34th.	0.893 Ranked 27th. 20% more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.647 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 2 times more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	3.9 Ranked 50th.	4.1 Ranked 49th. 5% more than Finland
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	2.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.	42.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 19 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	11,749 Terajoules Ranked 47th.	194,351 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 17 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.38 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	3,392 Terajoules Ranked 65th. 2 times more than Norway	1,471 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.647 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th. 2 times more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	33,462 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 4 times more than Norway	8,568 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.465 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.	5.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 11 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	182.99 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th. 78% more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	960 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 2 times more than Norway	475 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	114.18 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th.	159.19 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 17th. 39% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	13,720 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 43 times more than Norway	321 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	599 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	736 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 23% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 38 times more than Norway	0.069 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	19.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 42 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	167,381 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 43% more than Finland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	167,381 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 43% more than Finland
Proved > Reserves	0.0 Ranked 182nd.	2.31 trillion cu m Ranked 17th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.4 Ranked 51st. The same as Norway	0.4 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	2.62 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 38 times more than Norway	0.0694 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.258 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 5 times more than Norway	0.0519 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	2.24 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	42.04 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 19 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.38 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.543 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 34 times more than Norway	0.016 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.287 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.	1.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.543 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 34 times more than Norway	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	1,441 Terajoules Ranked 56th. 3 times more than Norway	495 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.275 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Norway	0.107 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	182.99 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th. 78% more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	960 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 2 times more than Norway	475 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	29,107 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 8 times more than Norway	3,826 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	2,440 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	24,191 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 10 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	31.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 62% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	115,737 Terajoules Ranked 48th. 47 times more than Norway	2,463 Terajoules Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	22.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 41 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	31.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 62% more than Finland
Including LNG > Net inland availability	37,814 Terajoules Ranked 62nd. 4 times more than Norway	10,514 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	7.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-68,431,787,423.037 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 36th.	1.54 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 6th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	2,848 Terajoules Ranked 37th. 38 times more than Norway	74 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.842 Ranked 34th.	1 Ranked 27th. 19% more than Finland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	4.4 Ranked 50th.	4.6 Ranked 49th. 5% more than Finland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.16 Ranked 50th.	0.17 Ranked 49th. 6% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	22.06 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 41 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules Ranked 87th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.275 Terajoules Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Norway	0.107 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	182.99 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 78% more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	114.18 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	159.19 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 39% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	19.45 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 42 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.258 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st. 5 times more than Norway	0.052 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Proved reserves per capita	0.0 Ranked 185th.	438,308.5 cu m Ranked 6th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Finland and Norway in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Finland & Norway

Definitions

Citation

Compare Finland and Norway in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Finland and Norway in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation