Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Germany & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Germany	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks at importers per million	829.61 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.	-6,165.514 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Consumption by chemical industry	240,000 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 495 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.412 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 2% more than Germany
Consumption by households	1.35 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 290 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption by households per 1000	16.37 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	10.85 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 82% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.33 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 49% more than Germany
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	6.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 76% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	6.61 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 76% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	131.5 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 63% more than Latvia	80.85 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants	811,901 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 32 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Net inland availability per 1000	33.36 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	22.51 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Changes in stocks	-41,760 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Changes in stocks at importers	67,328 Terajoules Ranked 1st.	-15,804 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.412 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st. 2% more than Germany
Consumption by energy sector	34,000 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 35 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	10.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 82% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	1.86 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 189 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	22.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Consumption by industry and construction	894,900 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 65 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	121.26 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 21st.	356.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Germany
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	18,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 42% more than Latvia	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption in agriculture	10,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 12 times more than Latvia	820 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.228 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Germany
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	9.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 11% more than Germany
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	832,744 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 22 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	10.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 65% more than Germany
Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Energy balance requirement	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 60 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Imports	3.42 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 51 times more than Latvia	66,710 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	10,845 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 58 times more than Latvia	186 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Imports > Per capita	41.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 43% more than Latvia	29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.
Net inland availability	2.75 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 116 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	33.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.228 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Germany
Changes in stocks per million	-506.37 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	16.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Imports per 1000	41.48 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 43% more than Latvia	29 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita	829.61 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd.	-6,111.369 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 49% more than Germany
Consumption by other consumers	496,000 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 114 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	544,900 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 63 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Gross inland availability	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 60 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	399.43 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th. 86% more than Latvia	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	110,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 24 times more than Latvia	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	10.1 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 65% more than Germany
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption in agriculture per million	121.26 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	356.44 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Germany
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	9.84 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 11% more than Germany

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation