Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Ireland & Norway

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Ireland	Norway
Consumption	4.98 billion cu m Ranked 35th. 4% more than Norway	4.81 billion cu m Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.21 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	1.4 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 16% more than Ireland
Consumption per capita	1,121.12 cu m Ranked 18th. 17% more than Norway	956.77 cu m Ranked 24th.
Imports	4.52 billion cu m Ranked 24th.	0.0 Ranked 177th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	5,142 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 10% more than Norway	4,668 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 22% more than Norway	1.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	24,216 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 101 times more than Norway	240 Terajoules Ranked 61st.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.011 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th. 45% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	18,110 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 37 times more than Norway	495 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 41 times more than Norway	0.107 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	14,745 Terajoules Ranked 62nd. 4 times more than Norway	3,826 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	9.91 billion cu m Ranked 78th.	2.07 trillion cu m Ranked 16th. 209 times more than Ireland
Reserves	9.91 billion cubic feet Ranked 61st.	1.72 trillion cubic feet Ranked 11th. 173 times more than Ireland
Reserves per capita	2,382.5 cubic feet Ranked 49th.	371,164.18 cubic feet Ranked 4th. 156 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	38.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 33% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	94,880 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 39 times more than Norway	2,463 Terajoules Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	22.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 43 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	38.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 33% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	161,407 Terajoules Ranked 59th.	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 48% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Gross > Production	21,437 Terajoules Ranked 65th.	3.57 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 166 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	93.82 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.	19,901.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 212 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Total resources	390,210 Terajoules Ranked 83th.	92.01 million Terajoules Ranked 15th. 236 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	228.66 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 12th.	1.54 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Ireland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	4.1 Ranked 51st.	4.6 Ranked 49th. 12% more than Ireland
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.4 Ranked 50th. The same as Norway	0.4 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	22.81 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 43 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules Ranked 87th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.35 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 41 times more than Norway	0.107 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	22.81 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 49 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	3.6 Ranked 51st.	4.1 Ranked 49th. 14% more than Ireland
Proved reserves per capita	2,075.18 cu m Ranked 63th.	438,308.5 cu m Ranked 6th. 211 times more than Ireland
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.82 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 112 times more than Norway	0.052 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.0108 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	0.016 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 48% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	3.54 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 4 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	38.8 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 33% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.96 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 7 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,215.07 cu m Ranked 64th.	473,078.5 cu m Ranked 6th. 214 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0938 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	19.9 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 212 times more than Ireland
Imports per capita	1,037.91 cu m Ranked 10th.	0.0 Ranked 118th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.15 Ranked 51st.	0.17 Ranked 49th. 13% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	3.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 4 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	94,880 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 44 times more than Norway	2,142 Terajoules Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 22% more than Norway	1.01 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	38.8 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 33% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	5.15 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	771.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 150 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	5.15 Terajoules Ranked 47th.	767.24 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 149 times more than Ireland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.884 Ranked 29th.	0.893 Ranked 27th. 1% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	10.17 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 32 times more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	4.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	42,326 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 29 times more than Norway	1,471 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	10.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 32 times more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	19,887 Terajoules Ranked 64th. 2 times more than Norway	8,568 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,638 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 14 times more than Norway	321 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 18 times more than Norway	0.069 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	22.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 49 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	161,407 Terajoules Ranked 59th.	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 48% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Net > Production	21,437 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	3.55 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 165 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Net inland availability	62,213 Terajoules Ranked 51st. 6 times more than Norway	10,514 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 7 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Proved > Reserves	9.91 billion cu m Ranked 76th.	2.31 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 233 times more than Ireland
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	44 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	74 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 68% more than Ireland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.01 Ranked 26th. 1% more than Norway	1 Ranked 27th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.15 Ranked 51st.	0.17 Ranked 49th. 13% more than Ireland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.28 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 18 times more than Norway	0.0694 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.82 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 112 times more than Norway	0.0519 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	4.78 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules Ranked 58th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Ireland and Norway in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Ireland & Norway

Definitions

Citation

Compare Ireland and Norway in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Ireland and Norway in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation