Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks per million	37.93 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 41 times more than Japan
Consumption by chemical industry	35,348 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 73 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.277 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 31% more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 3% more than Japan
Consumption by households	435,726 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 94 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.18 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 91% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Consumption by households per 1000	3.41 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 68% more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Japan
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.572 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Japan
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th. 4 times more than Japan
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.03 Terajoules Ranked 60th.	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Japan
Conversion in thermal power plants	2.05 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 81 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Gross inland availability per 1000	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Net inland availability per 1000	10.06 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 2% more than Japan
Imports per 1000	24.69 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	29 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 17% more than Japan
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st. 3% more than Japan
Consumption by energy sector	52,067 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 54 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Japan
Consumption by households and other consumers	1.04 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 106 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 91% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Consumption by industry and construction	240,402 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 18 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Conversion to other forms of energy	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 54 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	16.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 3% more than Japan
Gross inland availability > Per capita	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Imports > Per capita	24.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 17% more than Japan
Net inland availability	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 8th. 54 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	10.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 2% more than Japan
Consumption by iron and steel industry	73,082 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Latvia	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	16.14 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 3% more than Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.13 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 44 times more than Japan
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million	321.88 Terajoules Ranked 4th.	421.21 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 31% more than Japan
Changes in stocks	4,846 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 37% more than Latvia	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.277 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 31% more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.572 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Japan
Consumption by other consumers	608,830 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 140 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	41,127 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 42 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	131,972 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 15 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	16,607 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 26% more than Latvia	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 44 times more than Japan
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	16.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 46% more than Latvia	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 52 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Imports	3.15 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 47 times more than Latvia	66,710 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Gross inland availability	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 52 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-1,045,783,962,308.45 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.76 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	16.01 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 46% more than Latvia	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Consumption by households > Per capita	3.41 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 68% more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation