Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Japan & Lithuania

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Japan	Lithuania
Consumption	112.6 billion cu m Ranked 4th. 34 times more than Lithuania	3.3 billion cu m Ranked 6th.
Consumption > Per capita	787,077.22 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.	990,125.39 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 26% more than Japan
Consumption per capita	742.17 cu m Ranked 30th.	1,051.18 cu m Ranked 12th. 42% more than Japan
Imports	122.2 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 36 times more than Lithuania	3.4 billion cu m Ranked 38th.
Imports per capita	707.84 cu m Ranked 18th.	1,051.18 cu m Ranked 2nd. 49% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	35,348 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 16 times more than Lithuania	2,243 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	435,726 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 70 times more than Lithuania	6,255 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.572 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 35 times more than Lithuania	0.0164 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.0801 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 91 times more than Lithuania	0.000879 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.03 Terajoules Ranked 60th.	3.27 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 31% more than Japan
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	10.06 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 42% more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	163.99 cu m Ranked 85th.	0.0 Ranked 147th.
Proved reserves	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 73th.	0.0 Ranked 159th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	2.68 Ranked 8th. 22 times more than Lithuania	0.12 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	3.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	2.05 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 42 times more than Lithuania	48,561 Terajoules Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.277 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	0.657 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 2 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.00551 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	0.00908 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 65% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.127 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	7.9 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 62 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 31% more than Japan
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.508 Ranked 39th.	0.815 Ranked 30th. 60% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.18 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	64.9 Ranked 8th. 23 times more than Lithuania	2.8 Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million	321.88 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 280 times more than Lithuania	1.15 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	4,846 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Lithuania	744 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.277 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.	0.657 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 2 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	10,233 Terajoules Ranked 37th. 3411 times more than Lithuania	3 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.572 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 36 times more than Lithuania	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	608,830 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 259 times more than Lithuania	2,353 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.006 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.	0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 50% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	704 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 23 times more than Lithuania	31 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	41,127 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 10282 times more than Lithuania	4 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	131,972 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 12 times more than Lithuania	11,177 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	16,206 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	26,986 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 67% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.127 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.	7.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 62 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 31% more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 32 times more than Lithuania	63,482 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	16.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	18.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 15% more than Japan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 31% more than Japan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 28 times more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	24.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	33.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 38% more than Japan
Including LNG > Net inland availability	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 8th. 53 times more than Lithuania	24,126 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	10.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 42% more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-1,045,783,962,308.45 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th. 3 times more than Lithuania	-326,290,864,583.469 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	73,082 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 1305 times more than Lithuania	56 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	72.2 Ranked 8th. 23 times more than Lithuania	3.1 Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	7 Ranked 8th. 23 times more than Lithuania	0.3 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	16.14 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	18.59 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 15% more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.13 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	4.37 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 34 times more than Japan
Proved reserves per capita	164.24 cu m Ranked 90th.	0.0 Ranked 159th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	37.93 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	217.91 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	3.41 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 86% more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 10 times more than Lithuania	0.0422 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	3.95 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.	3.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.04 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 105 times more than Lithuania	9,932 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	240,402 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 18 times more than Lithuania	13,476 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	16,607 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 11% more than Lithuania	14,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	4.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 34 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	16.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 13% more than Lithuania	14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 28 times more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Imports	3.15 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 27 times more than Lithuania	115,949 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Proved > Reserves	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 74th.	0.0 Ranked 155th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.565 Ranked 39th.	0.902 Ranked 30th. 60% more than Japan
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	2.68 Ranked 8th. 22 times more than Lithuania	0.12 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.76 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	16.01 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 13% more than Lithuania	14.22 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	3.41 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 86% more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	24.69 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	33.96 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 38% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th. 10 times more than Lithuania	0.042 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	52,067 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 362 times more than Lithuania	144 Terajoules Ranked 71st.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Japan and Lithuania in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Japan & Lithuania

Definitions

Citation

Compare Japan and Lithuania in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Japan and Lithuania in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation