|
Consumption by industry and construction
|
191,188 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd.
7 times more
than
Taiwan
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
|
|
|
Consumption by industry and construction
>
Per capita
|
1.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
20% more than
Taiwan
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
|
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
|
150,134 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd.
5 times more
than
Taiwan
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
|
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
>
Per capita
|
1.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th.
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
6% more than
Japan
|
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
|
229,395 Terajoules
Ranked 1st.
17 times more
than
Taiwan
|
13,213 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
|
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
>
Per capita
|
1.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd.
3 times more
than
Taiwan
|
0.577 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.
|
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
|
229,395 Terajoules
Ranked 1st.
17 times more
than
Taiwan
|
13,213 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
|
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
>
Per capita
|
1.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd.
3 times more
than
Taiwan
|
0.577 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.
|
|
|
Gross inland availability
|
477,891 Terajoules
Ranked 1st.
11 times more
than
Taiwan
|
41,904 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
|
|
Gross inland availability
>
Per capita
|
3.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 2nd.
2 times more
than
Taiwan
|
1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
|
|
|
Net inland availability
|
191,188 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd.
7 times more
than
Taiwan
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
|
|
|
Net inland availability
>
Per capita
|
1.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
20% more than
Taiwan
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
|
|
|
Production
|
477,891 Terajoules
Ranked 1st.
11 times more
than
Taiwan
|
41,904 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
|
|
Production
>
Per capita
|
3.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 2nd.
2 times more
than
Taiwan
|
1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
|
|