×

Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Latvia & Malaysia

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Latvia Malaysia HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry 485 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
62,290 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 128 times more than Latvia

Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th.
2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th. 12 times more than Latvia

Consumption by energy sector 969 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.
1.52 million Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 1574 times more than Latvia

Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 51st.
60.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th. 143 times more than Latvia

Consumption by households 4,659 Terajoules
Ranked 49th. 22 times more than Malaysia
209 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.

Consumption by households and other consumers 9,839 Terajoules
Ranked 54th. 8 times more than Malaysia
1,171 Terajoules
Ranked 68th.

Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th. 93 times more than Malaysia
0.046 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 69th.

Consumption by industry and construction 13,714 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.
222,464 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 16 times more than Latvia

Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th.
8.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 47% more than Latvia

Consumption by transportation industry 75 Terajoules
Ranked 43th.
3,948 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 53 times more than Latvia

Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 32.6 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 38th.
155.76 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Latvia

Conversion to other forms of energy 38,386 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.
552,037 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 14 times more than Latvia

Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 29th.
21.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 31% more than Latvia

Energy balance requirement > Per capita 27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.
95.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia

Imports per 1000 29 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Malaysia
2.17 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita 27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.
95.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia

Imports > Per capita 29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Malaysia
2.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 49th.
Net inland availability 23,628 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.
227,583 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 10 times more than Latvia

Net inland availability > Per capita 10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th. 14% more than Malaysia
8.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th.

Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 16.69 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.
21.36 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 28% more than Latvia

Consumption by other consumers per 1000 1.9 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 51 times more than Malaysia
0.0372 Terajoules
Ranked 61st.

Consumption by other transportation per million 32.6 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.
152.77 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Latvia

Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 10.93 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
19.87 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 82% more than Latvia

Consumption by households > Per capita 2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th. 253 times more than Malaysia
0.008 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 61st.

Changes in stocks per million 1,539.22 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 45% more than Malaysia
1,064.74 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd.

Consumption by households per 1000 2.03 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 250 times more than Malaysia
0.00809 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.

Consumption by energy sector per 1000 0.421 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
59.01 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 140 times more than Latvia

Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 5.96 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
8.61 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 44% more than Latvia

Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 3.76 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
6.2 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 65% more than Latvia

Gross inland availability per 1000 27.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
93.28 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia

Net inland availability per 1000 10.27 Terajoules
Ranked 41st. 17% more than Malaysia
8.81 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.

Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 37th.
6.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd. 68% more than Latvia

Conversion in thermal power plants 25,156 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
513,419 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 20 times more than Latvia

Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.211 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.
2.41 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 11 times more than Latvia

Consumption by transportation industry per million 32.6 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.
152.77 Terajoules
Ranked 29th. 5 times more than Latvia

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million 80.85 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.
1,586.59 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 20 times more than Latvia

Energy balance requirement per 1000 27.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
93.28 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia

Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 4.28 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 94 times more than Malaysia
0.0453 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.

Changes in stocks 3,541 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
24,937 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 7 times more than Latvia

Consumption by other consumers 4,360 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 5 times more than Malaysia
962 Terajoules
Ranked 59th.

Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th. 50 times more than Malaysia
0.038 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 63th.

Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 32.6 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 32nd.
155.76 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 23th. 5 times more than Latvia

Consumption by other transportation 75 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
3,948 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 53 times more than Latvia

Consumption by other industries and construction 8,646 Terajoules
Ranked 69th.
160,174 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 19 times more than Latvia

Conversion in other energy-producing plants 13,230 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
38,618 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Latvia

Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Malaysia
1.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th.

Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 41st.
20.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th. 85% more than Latvia

Energy balance requirement 63,169 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.
2.41 million Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 38 times more than Latvia

Imports 66,710 Terajoules
Ranked 40th. 19% more than Malaysia
56,066 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 186 Terajoules
Ranked 37th.
41,003 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 220 times more than Latvia

Gross inland availability 63,169 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.
2.41 million Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 38 times more than Latvia

Statistical differences > Per capita 214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Malaysia
29.15 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 23th.

Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 5.75 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Malaysia
1.49 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×