Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Lithuania & Norway

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Lithuania	Norway	HISTORY
Consumption by agriculture per million	129.16 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 149 times more than Norway	0.865 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Consumption by chemical industry per million	1,488.15 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 20 times more than Norway	75.92 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	6.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 20 times more than Norway	0.332 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Norway	1.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.97 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Norway	1.66 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	2.13 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 9 times more than Norway	0.233 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per million	0.579 Terajoules Ranked 16th.	8.44 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 15 times more than Lithuania
Consumption by other consumers	7,920 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 30% more than Norway	6,111 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.32 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 75% more than Norway	1.32 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	2,203 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Norway	688 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.645 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 4 times more than Norway	0.149 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000	5.19 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Norway	1.28 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000	6.74 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 9 times more than Norway	0.786 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	11.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Norway	1.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Station use and station loss per million	355.86 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Norway	91.93 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Consumption by energy sector per million	413.55 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 127 times more than Norway	3.24 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-33,974,753,243.709 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th.	226.68 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 2nd.
Consumption by energy sector	1,412 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 94 times more than Norway	15 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Gross > Production > Per capita	14.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Norway	3.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Gross > Production > Other plants > Specify > Per capita	2,061.33 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Norway	942.83 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita	5.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Norway	1.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita	6.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 9 times more than Norway	0.786 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants	23,028 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Norway	3,636 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
By other energy products	57 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Norway	13 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Consumption by chemical industry	5,081 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 14 times more than Norway	351 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by agriculture	441 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 110 times more than Norway	4 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by agriculture > Per capita	129.16 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 6th. 149 times more than Norway	0.865 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 20 times more than Norway	0.076 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Consumption by industry and construction	7,284 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 7 times more than Norway	1,078 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 75% more than Norway	1.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.645 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 4 times more than Norway	0.149 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	7,458 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Norway	1,686 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	2.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 6 times more than Norway	0.365 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Norway	2.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	30,616 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Norway	7,652 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	2.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 9 times more than Norway	0.233 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.579 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 16th.	8.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 10th. 15 times more than Lithuania
Gross inland availability	48,569 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Norway	13,501 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Station use and station loss > Per capita	0.356 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Norway	0.092 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants	17,727 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Norway	5,931 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	22,255 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Norway	1,537 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	2 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	39 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 20 times more than Lithuania
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.414 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 138 times more than Norway	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Net inland availability	37,900 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Norway	8,730 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Gross inland availability per 1000	14.23 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Norway	2.92 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Net inland availability per 1000	11.1 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Norway	1.89 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Station use and station loss	1,215 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Norway	425 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
By other energy products per million	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Norway	2.81 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	2.18 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 6 times more than Norway	0.365 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by households per 1000	6.52 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 20 times more than Norway	0.332 Terajoules Ranked 24th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation