×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Malaysia & Poland

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Malaysia Poland HISTORY
Consumption 32.62 billion cu m
Ranked 18th. 2 times more than Poland
14.38 billion cu m
Ranked 24th.

Consumption > Per capita 1.04 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Poland
425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st.

Consumption per capita 962.19 cu m
Ranked 13th. 2 times more than Poland
428.03 cu m
Ranked 41st.

Imports 1.99 billion cu m
Ranked 47th.
37.38 billion cu m
Ranked 13th. 19 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 62,290 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 7 times more than Poland
9,004 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households 209 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.
150,123 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 718 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 59.01 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 296 times more than Poland
0.2 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.

Production None None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day 5.2
Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Poland
0.4
Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres 53.9
Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Poland
4.4
Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 2
Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Poland
0.16
Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million 2.12
Ranked 16th. 18 times more than Poland
0.115
Ranked 42nd.
Proved reserves 2.35 trillion cu m
Ranked 14th. 26 times more than Poland
92 billion cu m
Ranked 53th.

Reserves 2.23 trillion cubic feet
Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Poland
154.4 billion cubic feet
Ranked 31st.
Reserves per capita 86,288.74 cubic feet
Ranked 15th. 21 times more than Poland
4,045.54 cubic feet
Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 6.2 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 2 times more than Poland
2.58 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Exports per 1000 1.84 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 42 times more than Poland
0.0437 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 93.28 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 8.81 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.
9.69 Terajoules
Ranked 43th. 10% more than Malaysia

Proved > Reserves per capita 83,109.84 cu m
Ranked 20th. 19 times more than Poland
4,315.98 cu m
Ranked 55th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 3.74 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 49 times more than Poland
0.0767 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.

Imports per capita 0.0
Ranked 109th.
260.91 cu m
Ranked 32nd.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 1.23
Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Poland
0.49
Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 6.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd. 2 times more than Poland
2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 513,419 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 10 times more than Poland
49,729 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 2.41 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 10 times more than Poland
0.236 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 152.77 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.
287.22 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 88% more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000 2.49 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 1% more than Poland
2.46 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million 1,586.59 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Poland
186.56 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 93.28 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 111.22 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 23 times more than Poland
4.73 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 92.95 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 20 times more than Poland
4.73 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 1.18
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Poland
0.312
Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 0.0453 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.
6.01 Terajoules
Ranked 29th. 133 times more than Malaysia

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 29.9
Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Poland
11.9
Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 2
Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Poland
0.16
Ranked 45th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent 48.5
Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Poland
3.9
Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita 314.23 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 2nd.
-233.755 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 15th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers 6,234 Terajoules
Ranked 4th.
-8,990 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th. 10 times more than Poland
0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th.

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 1.52 million Terajoules
Ranked 1st. 200 times more than Poland
7,618 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 962 Terajoules
Ranked 59th.
78,027 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 81 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.038 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 63th.
2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd. 54 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 155.76 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 23th.
287.22 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 18th. 84% more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation 3,948 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
10,962 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 160,174 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 63% more than Poland
98,333 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses 64,475 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
93,843 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 46% more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita 2.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 3% more than Poland
2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 155.76 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 27th.
287.22 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 20th. 84% more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 3,948 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
10,962 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 2.41 million Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Poland
569,149 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Imports 56,066 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
398,547 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 41,003 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 6 times more than Poland
7,120 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.

Including LNG > Exports > Per capita 1.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th. 43 times more than Poland
0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 39th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 2.41 million Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Poland
569,149 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production 2.87 million Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 16 times more than Poland
180,700 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 3,817.84 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 50 times more than Poland
76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 68th.

Including LNG > Total resources 96.77 million Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 33 times more than Poland
2.93 million Terajoules
Ranked 58th.

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 29.15 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 23th.
-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 35th.

Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 1.91
Ranked 16th. 19 times more than Poland
0.102
Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.0372 Terajoules
Ranked 61st.
2.04 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 55 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million 152.77 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
287.22 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 88% more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 19.87 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 15 times more than Poland
1.3 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million 308.51 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd.
-233.741 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.

Proved reserves per capita 79,315.81 cu m
Ranked 18th. 33 times more than Poland
2,396.84 cu m
Ranked 62nd.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 1,064.74 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Poland
220.91 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.00809 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.
3.93 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 486 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 59.01 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 64 times more than Poland
0.928 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 8.61 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Poland
3.39 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 60.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th. 65 times more than Poland
0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 1.52 million Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 43 times more than Poland
35,420 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 8.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Poland
3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 1,171 Terajoules
Ranked 68th.
229,354 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 196 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 0.046 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 69th.
6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 29th. 131 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 222,464 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 72% more than Poland
129,549 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants 38,618 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Poland
13,647 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 1.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Poland
0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 20.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th. 16 times more than Poland
1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Exports 47,447 Terajoules
Ranked 31st. 28 times more than Poland
1,667 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 95.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 552,037 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 9 times more than Poland
63,897 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 21.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 13 times more than Poland
1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 95.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Poland
14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 2.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 49th.
10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Net > Production 2.4 million Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Poland
180,700 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability 227,583 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
369,865 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 63% more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 8.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th.
9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th. 8% more than Malaysia

Proved > Reserves 2.35 trillion cu m
Ranked 16th. 14 times more than Poland
164.8 billion cu m
Ranked 47th.

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 1.31
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Poland
0.346
Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 33.2
Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Poland
13.2
Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 3.2
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Poland
1.3
Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 1.23
Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Poland
0.49
Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 21.36 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 13 times more than Poland
1.67 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 1.49 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Poland
0.358 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.008 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 61st.
3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th. 492 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 2.17 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
10.44 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 5 times more than Malaysia

Including LNG > Changes in stocks 24,937 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Poland
8,431 Terajoules
Ranked 5th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×