Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Mexico & Norway

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Mexico	Norway
Consumption	59.15 billion cu m Ranked 11th. 12 times more than Norway	4.81 billion cu m Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Per capita	628,237.72 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.	1.4 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Mexico
Consumption per capita	513.65 cu m Ranked 38th.	956.77 cu m Ranked 24th. 86% more than Mexico
Imports	17.24 billion cu m Ranked 19th.	0.0 Ranked 177th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	123,324 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 26 times more than Norway	4,668 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	39,931 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 166 times more than Norway	240 Terajoules Ranked 61st.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	18.57 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Mexico
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	3.6 Ranked 18th.	7.6 Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Mexico
Production > Billion cubic metres	37.1 Ranked 18th.	78.5 Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Mexico
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	1.38 Ranked 18th.	2.92 Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Mexico
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.339 Ranked 32nd.	17.1 Ranked 4th. 50 times more than Mexico
Proved reserves	487.7 billion cu m Ranked 29th.	2.07 trillion cu m Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Mexico
Reserves	969.2 billion cubic feet Ranked 18th.	1.72 trillion cubic feet Ranked 11th. 77% more than Mexico
Reserves per capita	8,752.68 cubic feet Ranked 29th.	371,164.18 cubic feet Ranked 4th. 42 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	4.95 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 2 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	3,051.24 cu m Ranked 57th.	473,078.5 cu m Ranked 6th. 155 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.145 Terajoules Ranked 57th.	19.9 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 137 times more than Mexico
Imports per capita	101.7 cu m Ranked 38th.	0.0 Ranked 118th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	1.79 Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Norway	0.17 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd. 2 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	835,810 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 390 times more than Norway	2,142 Terajoules Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.11 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 10% more than Norway	1.01 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	305.99 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.839 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	5.23 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	18.57 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	16.1 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	771.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 48 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	15.5 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	767.24 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 49 times more than Mexico
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.396 Ranked 42nd.	0.893 Ranked 27th. 2 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.446 Terajoules Ranked 59th. 40% more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	43.3 Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Norway	4.1 Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2004 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.595 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	3.9 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Mexico
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	33.4 Ranked 18th.	70.6 Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 18% more than Norway	1.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.05 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	42.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	520,680 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Norway	194,351 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	4.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 2 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	49,428 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 34 times more than Norway	1,471 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.479 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 61st. 51% more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	465,142 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 54 times more than Norway	8,568 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.902 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.	5.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	328.68 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	33,883 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 71 times more than Norway	475 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	8.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th. 18 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	65,863 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Norway	18,013 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Norway	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	3.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.	44.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 14 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	0.095 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.	715.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 7533 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	273,523 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 37% more than Norway	199,129 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Norway	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	1.78 million Terajoules Ranked 20th.	3.57 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. Twice as much as Mexico
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	155.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.	19,901.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 128 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Total resources	16.08 million Terajoules Ranked 37th.	92.01 million Terajoules Ranked 15th. 6 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	568.06 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 9th.	1.54 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Mexico
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.441 Ranked 42nd.	1 Ranked 27th. 2 times more than Mexico
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	48.2 Ranked 12th. 10 times more than Norway	4.6 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	7.55 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 14 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules Ranked 87th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.361 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 7 times more than Norway	0.0519 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	4.7 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	42.04 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	4.2 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 2 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.27 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 79 times more than Norway	0.016 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	3.77 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	42.04 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.82 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 2 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	0.0888 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	715.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 8060 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	417,759 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Norway	194,351 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 85 times more than Norway	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	9,497 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 19 times more than Norway	495 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.092 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.	0.107 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th. 16% more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	328.68 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	33,883 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 71 times more than Norway	475 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	201,557 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 53 times more than Norway	3,826 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	92,943 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Norway	24,191 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Exports	9,832 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	3.31 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 337 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	835,810 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 339 times more than Norway	2,463 Terajoules Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	8.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th. 15 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.639 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	3.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 6 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Net > Production	1.72 million Terajoules Ranked 18th.	3.55 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Net inland availability	548,453 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 52 times more than Norway	10,514 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	5.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th. 2 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Proved > Reserves	359.7 billion cu m Ranked 37th.	2.31 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 6 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	140,261 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 1895 times more than Norway	74 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	4.6 Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Norway	0.4 Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	1.79 Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Norway	0.17 Ranked 49th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.305 Ranked 32nd.	15.37 Ranked 4th. 50 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0858 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	0.107 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 25% more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	305.99 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	7.55 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 16 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	3.05 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	44.94 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 15 times more than Mexico
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	1.38 Ranked 18th.	2.92 Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Mexico
Proved reserves per capita	4,196.32 cu m Ranked 56th.	438,308.5 cu m Ranked 6th. 104 times more than Mexico
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.387 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th. 7 times more than Norway	0.052 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Mexico and Norway in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Mexico & Norway

Definitions

Citation

Compare Mexico and Norway in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Mexico and Norway in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation