Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Poland & Sweden

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Poland	Sweden
Consumption	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th. 11 times more than Sweden	1.3 billion cu m Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Per capita	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 4 times more than Sweden	111,393 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Consumption per capita	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Sweden	132.17 cu m Ranked 46th.
Imports	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th. 33 times more than Sweden	1.13 billion cu m Ranked 33th.
Imports per capita	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd. 97% more than Sweden	132.17 cu m Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 2 times more than Sweden	3,944 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks > Per capita	0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Sweden	0.007 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 71 times more than Sweden	2,127 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.14 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Sweden	1.07 Terajoules Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 3 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Sweden	2.53 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th.	0.0 Ranked 122nd.
Proved reserves	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th.	0.0 Ranked 130th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Sweden	1.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th. 5 times more than Sweden	9,193 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	0.437 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 85% more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Sweden	79.18 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 3 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.312 Ranked 46th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.0778 Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 8 times more than Sweden	0.801 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	11.9 Ranked 36th. 17 times more than Sweden	0.7 Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 133 times more than Sweden	0.007 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 562 times more than Sweden	63 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Sweden	1.65 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 32 times more than Sweden	7,234 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 7 times more than Sweden	0.802 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 9 times more than Sweden	14,893 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Sweden	79.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 15 times more than Sweden	715 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.	0.024 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	123 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 78% more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	31.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.	114.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	13,647 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 10 times more than Sweden	1,321 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	1,204 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 17% more than Sweden	1,030 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Sweden	0.146 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th. 28% more than Sweden	1.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 78th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 15 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Imports	398,547 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 10 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 2 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 16 times more than Sweden	22,842 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Sweden	2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.	616.24 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 8th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.346 Ranked 46th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.089 Ranked 55th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.3 Ranked 36th. 13 times more than Sweden	0.1 Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th. 41% more than Sweden	1.19 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.358 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Sweden	0.146 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Proved reserves per capita	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd.	0.0 Ranked 130th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 17 times more than Sweden	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks per million	44.94 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Sweden	6.98 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 133 times more than Sweden	0.00698 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 2 times more than Sweden	1.65 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.	0.437 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th. 85% more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks	1,715 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 27 times more than Sweden	63 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 19 times more than Sweden	4,077 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Sweden	0.452 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Sweden	79.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 15 times more than Sweden	715 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 10 times more than Sweden	9,688 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 3 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th. 6 times more than Sweden	10,733 Terajoules Ranked 83th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th. 41% more than Sweden	1.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 3 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 15 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Proved > Reserves	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th.	0.0 Ranked 128th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 18 times more than Sweden	1,261 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	13.2 Ranked 36th. 16 times more than Sweden	0.8 Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Sweden	0.452 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Sweden	79.18 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	3.19 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	24.25 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	31.55 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	114.07 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th. 28% more than Sweden	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 17 times more than Sweden	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	10.44 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 2 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 44th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Poland and Sweden in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Poland & Sweden

Definitions

Citation

Compare Poland and Sweden in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Poland and Sweden in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation