Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Portugal & Sweden

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Portugal	Sweden
Consumption	5.21 billion cu m Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Sweden	1.3 billion cu m Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Per capita	386,363.18 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Sweden	111,393 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Consumption per capita	455.77 cu m Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Sweden	132.17 cu m Ranked 46th.
Imports	5.18 billion cu m Ranked 33th. 5 times more than Sweden	1.13 billion cu m Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	2,996 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	3,944 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 32% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.284 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	0.437 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th. 54% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption by households	9,301 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Sweden	2,127 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.182 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 30% more than Sweden	0.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	6,340 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 56% more than Sweden	4,077 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.601 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th. 33% more than Sweden	0.452 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	39,554 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Sweden	9,688 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	517 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	715 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 38% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	49.01 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 30th.	79.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 26th. 62% more than Portugal
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	0.0 Ranked 183th.	0.0 Ranked 130th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	16.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th. 4 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	107,403 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 10 times more than Sweden	10,733 Terajoules Ranked 83th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	10.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th. 9 times more than Sweden	1.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	16.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th. 4 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	174,482 Terajoules Ranked 56th. 4 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-1,327,083,402.451 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 30th.	616.24 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	1,919 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 52% more than Sweden	1,261 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.3 Ranked 56th. 3 times more than Sweden	0.1 Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	10.18 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 9 times more than Sweden	1.19 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.601 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 33% more than Sweden	0.452 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	49.01 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	79.18 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 62% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	58.39 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Sweden	24.25 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	16.87 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	114.07 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Portugal
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	10.18 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 10 times more than Sweden	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Proved reserves per capita	0.0 Ranked 182nd.	0.0 Ranked 130th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.882 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	17.17 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.182 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 30% more than Sweden	0.14 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	3.75 Terajoules Ranked 37th. 3 times more than Sweden	1.07 Terajoules Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	16.54 Terajoules Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	5.76 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 2 times more than Sweden	2.53 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	0.0 Ranked 169th.	0.0 Ranked 122nd.
Imports per capita	460.38 cu m Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Sweden	132.17 cu m Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	3.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Sweden	1.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	107,403 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 12 times more than Sweden	9,193 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.284 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	0.437 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 54% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	49.01 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	79.18 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 62% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	16.54 Terajoules Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.267 Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Sweden	0.0778 Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	1.5 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 87% more than Sweden	0.801 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	2.8 Ranked 55th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.7 Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.351 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 55th. 50 times more than Sweden	0.007 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	3,705 Terajoules Ranked 59th. 59 times more than Sweden	63 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	4.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Sweden	1.65 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	15,819 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 2 times more than Sweden	7,234 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	1.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 87% more than Sweden	0.802 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	44,469 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Sweden	14,893 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	49.01 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 36th.	79.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 32nd. 62% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	517 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	715 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 38% more than Portugal
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.058 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Sweden	0.024 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	601 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Sweden	219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	16.87 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 32nd.	114.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Portugal
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	12 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	1,321 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 110 times more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	178 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	1,030 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Portugal
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.001 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	0.146 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 146 times more than Portugal
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	10.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th. 10 times more than Sweden	1.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 78th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	174,482 Terajoules Ranked 56th. 4 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Imports	181,102 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 5 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	17.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	60,805 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 3 times more than Sweden	22,842 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	5.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd. 2 times more than Sweden	2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Proved > Reserves	0.0 Ranked 179th.	0.0 Ranked 128th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.295 Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Sweden	0.089 Ranked 55th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	3.1 Ranked 55th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.8 Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.00119 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	0.146 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 123 times more than Portugal
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.882 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Sweden	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.351 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 50 times more than Sweden	0.00698 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	4.22 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Sweden	1.65 Terajoules Ranked 64th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Portugal and Sweden in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Portugal & Sweden

Definitions

Citation

Compare Portugal and Sweden in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Portugal and Sweden in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation