Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Slovakia & United States

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Slovakia	United States
Consumption	6.47 billion cu m Ranked 33th.	689.9 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 107 times more than Slovakia
Consumption > Per capita	1.14 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 27th.	2.17 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 90% more than Slovakia
Consumption per capita	1,198.28 cu m Ranked 15th.	2,107.76 cu m Ranked 7th. 76% more than Slovakia
Imports	50.18 billion cu m Ranked 5th.	88.77 billion cu m Ranked 2nd. 77% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	3,373 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	1.91 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 568 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by households	65,943 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	5.22 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 79 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.26 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	1.46 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 16% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.155 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	4.08 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 26 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	6.48 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	9.39 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 45% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	2.68 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 2% more than United States	2.63 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	50.81 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	81.05 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 60% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	33.92 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	48.43 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 43% more than Slovakia
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,607.69 cu m Ranked 60th.	22,397.07 cu m Ranked 30th. 9 times more than Slovakia
Proved reserves	14.16 billion cu m Ranked 75th.	9.46 trillion cu m Ranked 5th. 668 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.109 Terajoules Ranked 61st.	0.775 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 7 times more than Slovakia
Imports per capita	1,287.05 cu m Ranked 6th. 4 times more than United States	345.86 cu m Ranked 28th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.25 Ranked 46th.	24.05 Ranked 1st. 96 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	6.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	9.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 44% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	29,657 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	7.19 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 243 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.626 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	6.48 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 10 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	2.51 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	5,184.52 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than United States	2,230.22 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	3.33 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 43% more than United States	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	14.85 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	2,919.98 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 197 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	50.81 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	81.05 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 60% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	1.1 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	85.16 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 77 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	1.09 Terajoules Ranked 67th.	67.58 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 62 times more than Slovakia
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.13 Ranked 18th.	1.99 Ranked 9th. 75% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	20.36 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	28.88 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 42% more than Slovakia
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	6.1 Ranked 46th.	582 Ranked 1st. 95 times more than Slovakia
Consumption > Date of > Information	2004 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.626 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.	6.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 10 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	836 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	1.21 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 1444 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.	1.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 15% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	41,894 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	3.32 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 79 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	7.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th.	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 44% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	5,184.52 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than United States	2,223.49 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	27,929 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	659,066 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.	2.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	6,692 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	741,444 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 111 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	34,931 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	2.77 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 79 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	17,930 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	688,166 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 38 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	29,451 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	57,508 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 95% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	5.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 27 times more than United States	0.206 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	5.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	24.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Exports	14,461 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	776,615 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 54 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	50.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.	80.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 59% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	65,814 Terajoules Ranked 61st.	7.19 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 109 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	12.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.	24.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 99% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.008 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	0.444 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 56 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	50.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.	80.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 59% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	273,707 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	23.95 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 88 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Gross > Production	5,921 Terajoules Ranked 76th.	25.17 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 4250 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	52.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 3 times more than United States	15.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	5,876 Terajoules Ranked 75th.	19.97 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 3399 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Net inland availability	182,706 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	14.31 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 78 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	33.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	48.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 42% more than Slovakia
Proved > Reserves	14.16 billion cu m Ranked 75th.	6.93 trillion cu m Ranked 6th. 489 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	6,780 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	430,902 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 64 times more than Slovakia
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.25 Ranked 46th.	24.05 Ranked 1st. 96 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	12.22 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	24.35 Terajoules Ranked 16th. Twice as much as Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	5.47 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 27 times more than United States	0.206 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Proved reserves per capita	2,580.02 cu m Ranked 61st.	30,132.45 cu m Ranked 28th. 12 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-189.159 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	-223.064 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 18% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	12.24 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	17.66 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 44% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	1.5 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	6.59 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	8.37 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	17.32 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	8,065 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	1.95 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 242 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	8.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	17.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	109,693 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	8.53 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 78 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	20.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th.	28.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 41% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	45,084 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	5.12 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 114 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	3.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 43% more than United States	2.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	5,184.52 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than United States	2,223.49 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	27,929 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	659,066 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Flared and vented	45 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	131,593 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 2924 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	273,707 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	23.95 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 88 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Imports	281,273 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	4.69 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 17 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	80 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	786,624 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 9833 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 2% more than United States	2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	108.65 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.	772.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 7 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Total resources	585,315 Terajoules Ranked 78th.	228.9 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 391 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-164,841,284,573.973 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 38th.	-640,962,665,277.601 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 42nd. 4 times more than Slovakia
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.26 Ranked 17th.	2.21 Ranked 9th. 75% more than Slovakia
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	6.8 Ranked 46th.	646.7 Ranked 1st. 95 times more than Slovakia
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.7 Ranked 46th.	62.4 Ranked 1st. 89 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	7.78 Terajoules Ranked 8th.	11.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 44% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	5,184.52 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than United States	2,230.22 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	5.51 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	24.35 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	12.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th.	17.6 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 44% more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.00835 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	0.445 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 53 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	52.21 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 3 times more than United States	15.88 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-1,019 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	-65,919 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 65 times more than Slovakia
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	1.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.	6.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Slovakia

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Slovakia and United States in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Slovakia & United States

Definitions

Citation

Compare Slovakia and United States in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Slovakia and United States in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation