|
Consumption by industry and construction
|
66,077 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
2 times more
than
Taiwan
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
|
|
|
Consumption by industry and construction
>
Per capita
|
1.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
9% more than
Taiwan
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
|
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
|
66,077 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
2 times more
than
Taiwan
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
|
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
>
Per capita
|
1.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th.
9% more than
Taiwan
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
|
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
|
74,691 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd.
6 times more
than
Taiwan
|
13,213 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
|
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
>
Per capita
|
1.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
3 times more
than
Taiwan
|
0.577 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.
|
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
|
74,691 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd.
6 times more
than
Taiwan
|
13,213 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
|
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
>
Per capita
|
1.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th.
3 times more
than
Taiwan
|
0.577 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.
|
|
|
Gross inland availability
|
140,767 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
3 times more
than
Taiwan
|
41,904 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
|
|
Gross inland availability
>
Per capita
|
2.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
59% more than
Taiwan
|
1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
|
|
|
Net inland availability
|
66,077 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
2 times more
than
Taiwan
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
|
|
|
Net inland availability
>
Per capita
|
1.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
9% more than
Taiwan
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
|
|
|
Production
|
140,767 Terajoules
Ranked 6th.
3 times more
than
Taiwan
|
41,904 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
|
|
Production
>
Per capita
|
2.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
59% more than
Taiwan
|
1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
|
|