×

Environment Stats: compare key data on American Samoa & French Polynesia

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT American Samoa French Polynesia HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 8
Ranked 143th.
33
Ranked 28th. 4 times more than American Samoa
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 9
Ranked 167th.
27
Ranked 77th. 3 times more than American Samoa
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 1
Ranked 201st.
0.0
Ranked 206th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 293.04 kt
Ranked 174th.
692.31 kt
Ranked 158th. 2 times more than American Samoa

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 5.14 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 69th. 85% more than French Polynesia
2.79 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 94th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 4.96 kt
Ranked 67th. 78% more than French Polynesia
2.79 kt
Ranked 91st.

Current issues limited natural fresh water resources; the water division of the government has spent substantial funds in the past few years to improve water catchments and pipelines NA
Endangered species > Bird species 8
Ranked 115th.
32
Ranked 24th. 4 times more than American Samoa

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 8
Ranked 156th.
13
Ranked 114th. 63% more than American Samoa
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 1
Ranked 156th.
47
Ranked 43th. 47 times more than American Samoa

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 1
Ranked 193th. The same as French Polynesia
1
Ranked 187th.
Forest area > Sq. km 180 km²
Ranked 171st.
1,050 km²
Ranked 156th. 6 times more than American Samoa

Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 3.09 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 94th.
4.09 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 85th. 33% more than American Samoa

Proportion of land area under protection 2.93%
Ranked 189th. 48% more than French Polynesia
1.98%
Ranked 197th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 23th. The same as French Polynesia
100
Ranked 6th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 96.9
Ranked 64th.
97.12
Ranked 61st. About the same as American Samoa

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 24th. The same as French Polynesia
100
Ranked 5th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 1
Ranked 177th.
47
Ranked 52nd. 47 times more than American Samoa
Biodiversity > Number 0.27
Ranked 159th.
4.57
Ranked 54th. 17 times more than American Samoa

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 0.27
Ranked 164th.
4.57
Ranked 55th. 17 times more than American Samoa

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 4
Ranked 179th.
7
Ranked 163th. 75% more than American Samoa
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 16.84%
Ranked 68th. 152 times more than French Polynesia
0.11%
Ranked 212th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 4.73
Ranked 29th.
17.39
Ranked 10th. 4 times more than American Samoa

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 32nd. The same as French Polynesia
100
Ranked 10th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 96.9%
Ranked 57th.
97.12%
Ranked 55th. About the same as American Samoa

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 3.04 km²
Ranked 92nd.
4.12 km²
Ranked 84th. 35% more than American Samoa

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 78
Ranked 169th.
148
Ranked 156th. 90% more than American Samoa
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 7
Ranked 81st.
8
Ranked 73th. 14% more than American Samoa
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 96.9
Ranked 71st.
97.12
Ranked 67th. About the same as American Samoa

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 17.14%
Ranked 34th. 211 times more than French Polynesia
0.0814%
Ranked 158th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 1.37
Ranked 64th. 2 times more than French Polynesia
0.635
Ranked 91st.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 129th.
0.0
Ranked 72nd.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 129th.
0.0
Ranked 111th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 144th.
0.11%
Ranked 167th.

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.47% of GNI
Ranked 57th. 4 times more than French Polynesia
0.11% of GNI
Ranked 172nd.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 17.04%
Ranked 22nd. 92% more than French Polynesia
8.87%
Ranked 54th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 170th.
0.0
Ranked 102nd.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 96.9
Ranked 57th.
97.12
Ranked 55th. About the same as American Samoa

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 1.74%
Ranked 62nd. 22 times more than French Polynesia
0.08%
Ranked 124th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 16.84%
Ranked 59th. 16 times more than French Polynesia
1.07%
Ranked 172nd.
Forest area > % of land area 90% of land area
Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than French Polynesia
28.69% of land area
Ranked 96th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 171st.
0.0
Ranked 116th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×