×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Australia & Palau

Definitions

STAT Australia Palau HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 51
Ranked 14th. 13 times more than Palau
4
Ranked 178th.
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 106
Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Palau
15
Ranked 131st.
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 55
Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Palau
4
Ranked 157th.
CO2 Emissions per 1000 16.71
Ranked 7th. 36% more than Palau
12.27
Ranked 11th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 354,054.6 kt
Ranked 15th. 1464 times more than Palau
241.76 kt
Ranked 178th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 17.8 kt
Ranked 11th. 45% more than Palau
12.27 kt
Ranked 17th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 373,080.58
Ranked 18th. 1724 times more than Palau
216.35
Ranked 184th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 16.91
Ranked 12th. 60% more than Palau
10.57
Ranked 26th.

Current issues soil erosion from overgrazing, industrial development, urbanization, and poor farming practices; soil salinity rising due to the use of poor quality water; desertification; clearing for agricultural purposes threatens the natural habitat of many unique animal and plant species; the Great Barrier Reef off the northeast coast, the largest coral reef in the world, is threatened by increased shipping and its popularity as a tourist site; limited natural fresh water resources inadequate facilities for disposal of solid waste; threats to the marine ecosystem from sand and coral dredging, illegal fishing practices, and overfishing
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 17.74
Ranked 11th. 68% more than Palau
10.54
Ranked 25th.

Endangered species > Bird species 49
Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Palau
2
Ranked 175th.

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 57
Ranked 9th. 14 times more than Palau
4
Ranked 149th.
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 80.52 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Palau
19.9 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 31st.
Proportion of land area under protection 12.85%
Ranked 115th.
15.95%
Ranked 97th. 24% more than Australia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 21st. 5% more than Palau
95.26
Ranked 100th.

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 17.82 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 13th. 45% more than Palau
12.27 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 20th.
Endangered species > Fish species > Number 84
Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Palau
12
Ranked 126th.
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 55
Ranked 39th. 14 times more than Palau
4
Ranked 115th.

Pollution > Ozone depleting substance consumption 46.81
Ranked 50th. 275 times more than Palau
0.17
Ranked 144th.

Biodiversity richness 1
Ranked 48th.
3
Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Australia
Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 16.91
Ranked 12th. 60% more than Palau
10.57
Ranked 26th.

Forest area > Sq. km 1.64 million km²
Ranked 6th. 4092 times more than Palau
400 km²
Ranked 166th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.47
Ranked 91st.
$1.26
Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Australia

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 23th. The same as Palau
100
Ranked 24th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 373,738.99
Ranked 15th. 1759 times more than Palau
212.51
Ranked 174th.

Pollution > Ozone depleting substance consumption per million people 2.1
Ranked 80th.
8.25
Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Australia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 22nd. 16% more than Palau
86.02
Ranked 116th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 89
Ranked 37th. 22 times more than Palau
4
Ranked 143th.
Threatened species 483
Ranked 2nd. 44 times more than Palau
11
Ranked 129th.
Biodiversity > Number 87.69
Ranked 3rd. 70 times more than Palau
1.25
Ranked 111th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 87.69
Ranked 3rd. 70 times more than Palau
1.25
Ranked 116th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.72
Ranked 76th.
$1.58
Ranked 32nd. 2 times more than Australia

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 5,485
Ranked 7th. 914 times more than Palau
6
Ranked 173th.
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 15.05%
Ranked 85th.
28.2%
Ranked 28th. 87% more than Australia

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 4.1
Ranked 32nd.
61.76
Ranked 1st. 15 times more than Australia

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100%
Ranked 23th. The same as Palau
100%
Ranked 24th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 30th. 3% more than Palau
96.99
Ranked 116th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 80.25 km²
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Palau
20.09 km²
Ranked 31st.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 94,008
Ranked 13th. 1424 times more than Palau
66
Ranked 174th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 2.75
Ranked 25th.
0.0
Ranked 181st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 9.03
Ranked 2nd.
0.0
Ranked 182nd.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 199,294.12
Ranked 11th.
0.0
Ranked 182nd.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 60,674.18
Ranked 30th.
0.0
Ranked 181st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 4.9
Ranked 25th.
10.57
Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Australia

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 384
Ranked 5th. 26 times more than Palau
15
Ranked 51st.
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 100
Ranked 25th. The same as Palau
100
Ranked 26th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $142.69 billion
Ranked 12th. 6798 times more than Palau
$20.99 million
Ranked 163th.

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 33.24%
Ranked 15th. 10% more than Palau
30.28%
Ranked 20th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 4.97
Ranked 10th. 42% more than Palau
3.5
Ranked 13th.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ $39.90 billion
Ranked 18th.
0.0
Ranked 170th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 10.74%
Ranked 47th.
0.0
Ranked 181st.

Forest area > % of land area 21.31% of land area
Ranked 119th.
86.96% of land area
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Australia

International agreements > Signed but not ratified none of the selected agreements none of the selected agreements
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 4.12%
Ranked 42nd.
0.0
Ranked 145th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 70.65%
Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than Palau
8.74%
Ranked 22nd.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 0.1%
Ranked 188th.
1.3%
Ranked 169th. 13 times more than Australia
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 3.76%
Ranked 14th.
0.0
Ranked 141st.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100
Ranked 23th. The same as Palau
100
Ranked 24th.

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.37% of GNI
Ranked 86th.
1.15% of GNI
Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Australia

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 28.34%
Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Palau
7.41%
Ranked 57th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ $36.45 billion
Ranked 2nd.
0.0
Ranked 169th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 28.99%
Ranked 165th.
100%
Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Australia

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 16.26%
Ranked 73th.
0.0
Ranked 181st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 53.42%
Ranked 17th.
0.0
Ranked 182nd.

CO2 Emissions 332,377
Ranked 14th. 1375 times more than Palau
241.8
Ranked 159th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 108,158.16
Ranked 21st. 500 times more than Palau
216.35
Ranked 183th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.29%
Ranked 91st.
0.5%
Ranked 44th. 72% more than Australia

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 14.73%
Ranked 7th. 28% more than Palau
11.47%
Ranked 68th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations World Statistics Pocketbook and Statistical Yearbook; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×