Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Austria & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Austria	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry	26,702 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 55 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.25 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 15 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	1.94 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 5 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by households	67,028 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 14 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption by households per 1000	8.15 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.02 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9% more than Austria
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	8.95 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Consumption by transportation industry per million	1,313.96 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 40 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	663.01 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 8 times more than Latvia	80.85 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants	119,356 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 5 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	46.33 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 69% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	46.33 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 69% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Net inland availability per 1000	27.21 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	11.87 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Changes in stocks	19,898 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Latvia	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 15 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 5 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.
Consumption by energy sector	15,923 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 16 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	97,684 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 10 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	11.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Consumption by industry and construction	115,386 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 8 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	1,313.08 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th. 40 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 38th.
Consumption by transportation industry	10,811 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 144 times more than Latvia	75 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	91.94 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 26th.	356.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Austria
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	10,183 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 30% more than Austria
Consumption in agriculture	757 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	820 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 8% more than Austria
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Austria
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 33% more than Latvia	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	46.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 69% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	129,539 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 3 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	15.73 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 6% more than Austria
Gross inland availability > Per capita	46.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 69% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Gross inland availability	381,217 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 6 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Imports > Per capita	45.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 58% more than Latvia	29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.
Net inland availability	223,881 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 9 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	27.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	784.98 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Latvia	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	15.74 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 6% more than Austria
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Austria
Changes in stocks per million	2,418.38 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 57% more than Latvia	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	8.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Imports per 1000	45.94 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 58% more than Latvia	29 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 9% more than Austria
Consumption by other consumers	29,899 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 7 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	3.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 92% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	1,313.08 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th. 40 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by other transportation	10,811 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 144 times more than Latvia	75 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	73,636 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 9 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Energy balance requirement	381,217 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 6 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Imports	377,950 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 6 times more than Latvia	66,710 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	5,299 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 28 times more than Latvia	186 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	15,048 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	3.63 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 92% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other transportation per million	1,313.96 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 40 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Consumption in agriculture per million	92 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	356.44 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Austria
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	14.51 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 33% more than Latvia	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation