×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Canada & Guam

Definitions

STAT Canada Guam HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 16
Ranked 64th. 14% more than Guam
14
Ranked 83th.
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 36
Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Guam
9
Ranked 163th.
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 11
Ranked 85th. 6 times more than Guam
2
Ranked 182nd.
CO2 emissions > Kt 565,537.9 kt
Ranked 7th. 139 times more than Guam
4,080.58 kt
Ranked 115th.

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 17.88 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 12th.
24.91 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th. 39% more than Canada

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 17.85 kt
Ranked 10th.
25.86 kt
Ranked 5th. 45% more than Canada

Current issues air pollution and resulting acid rain severely affecting lakes and damaging forests; metal smelting, coal-burning utilities, and vehicle emissions impacting on agricultural and forest productivity; ocean waters becoming contaminated due to agricultural, industrial, mining, and forestry activities extirpation of native bird population by the rapid proliferation of the brown tree snake, an exotic, invasive species
Endangered species > Bird species 16
Ranked 51st. 33% more than Guam
12
Ranked 77th.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 26
Ranked 44th. 3 times more than Guam
9
Ranked 146th.
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 2
Ranked 144th.
4
Ranked 113th. Twice as much as Canada

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 12
Ranked 70th. 6 times more than Guam
2
Ranked 175th.
Forest area > Sq. km 3.1 million km²
Ranked 3rd. 11928 times more than Guam
260 km²
Ranked 170th.

Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 96.02 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 4th. 63 times more than Guam
1.53 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 127th.

Proportion of land area under protection 8.56%
Ranked 140th.
26.84%
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Canada

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 99.81
Ranked 39th. About the same as Guam
99.42
Ranked 51st.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 99.81
Ranked 37th. 2% more than Guam
97.39
Ranked 58th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 99
Ranked 51st.
99.42
Ranked 43th. About the same as Canada

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 2
Ranked 168th.
4
Ranked 139th. Twice as much as Canada
Biodiversity > Number 21.51
Ranked 17th. 102 times more than Guam
0.21
Ranked 165th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 21.51
Ranked 17th. 101 times more than Guam
0.213
Ranked 170th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 5,122
Ranked 9th. 427 times more than Guam
12
Ranked 145th.
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 7.02%
Ranked 128th. 33% more than Guam
5.27%
Ranked 142nd.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 0.646
Ranked 67th.
1.35
Ranked 51st. 2 times more than Canada

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 99%
Ranked 38th. 2% more than Guam
97.39%
Ranked 53th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 44th. 1% more than Guam
99.42
Ranked 76th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 95.98 km²
Ranked 4th. 58 times more than Guam
1.64 km²
Ranked 121st.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 119,713
Ranked 7th. 108 times more than Guam
1,111
Ranked 111th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 563
Ranked 3rd. 47 times more than Guam
12
Ranked 61st.
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 100
Ranked 36th. 3% more than Guam
97.39
Ranked 63th.

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 1.35%
Ranked 118th.
2.63%
Ranked 93th. 95% more than Canada

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 3.93
Ranked 11th.
7.22
Ranked 4th. 84% more than Canada
Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 99
Ranked 38th. 2% more than Guam
97.39
Ranked 53th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ $76.92 billion
Ranked 6th.
0.0
Ranked 146th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ $8.93 billion
Ranked 8th.
0.0
Ranked 137th.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 1.67e-05%
Ranked 151st.
12.99%
Ranked 40th. 776847 times more than Canada

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 8.23%
Ranked 109th.
20.86%
Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Canada
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 1.06%
Ranked 76th. 3% more than Guam
1.03%
Ranked 77th.
Forest area > % of land area 34.1% of land area
Ranked 77th.
47.27% of land area
Ranked 44th. 39% more than Canada

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×