×

Education > Literacy > Reading performance Stats: compare key data on China & United States

Compare vs for  

Definitions

  • Access and retrieve: Access and retrieve.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

  • Continuous texts: Continuous texts.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

  • Integrate and interpret: Integrate and interpret.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

  • Non-continuous texts: Non-continuous texts.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

  • Overall: Overall.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

  • Overall reading skills: Overall.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

  • Reflect and evaluate: Reflect and evaluate.

    No date was available from the Wikipedia article, so we used the date of retrieval.

STAT China United States
Access and retrieve 530
Ranked 4th. 8% more than United States
492
Ranked 25th.
Continuous texts 538
Ranked 2nd. 8% more than United States
500
Ranked 13th.
Integrate and interpret 530
Ranked 3rd. 7% more than United States
495
Ranked 20th.
Non-continuous texts 522
Ranked 6th. 4% more than United States
503
Ranked 14th.
Overall 533
Ranked 3rd. 7% more than United States
500
Ranked 15th.
Overall reading skills 533
Ranked 3rd. 7% more than United States
500
Ranked 15th.
Reflect and evaluate 540
Ranked 2nd. 5% more than United States
512
Ranked 8th.

Citation

"Education > Literacy > Reading performance: China and United States compared", NationMaster. Retrieved from http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/China/United-States/Education/Literacy/Reading-performance