Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Denmark	Latvia
Consumption	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.52 billion cu m Ranked 63th.
Consumption > Per capita	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.	902,730.76 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 8% more than Denmark
Consumption per capita	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th. 18% more than Latvia	677.21 cu m Ranked 35th.
Imports	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.	1.58 billion cu m Ranked 50th. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 8 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 7 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 14 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 2% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 9% more than Latvia	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th.	0.0 Ranked 127th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 3 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 41% more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 9% more than Latvia	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 2% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 29% more than Latvia	356.44 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 57% more than Latvia	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Proved reserves per capita	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st.	0.0 Ranked 127th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 14 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 40% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 41% more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 98th.	773.01 cu m Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 40% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 4 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	24.36 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	80.85 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 38% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 95% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 32 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 3% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 95% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 2 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 29% more than Latvia	356.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Latvia	820 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 57% more than Latvia	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 3 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	132 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	186 Terajoules Ranked 37th. 41% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th. 3 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 3% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Denmark and Latvia in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Denmark and Latvia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Denmark and Latvia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation