Energy > Blast Furnace Gas Stats: compare key data on Finland & Russia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Finland	Russia	HISTORY
Consumption by industry and construction per million	1,758.64 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Russia	1,509 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per million	1,758.64 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Russia	1,509 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	468 Terajoules Ranked 5th.	18,024 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 39 times more than Finland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	89.21 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd.	125.94 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 41% more than Finland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per million	89.21 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.	125.91 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 41% more than Finland
Conversion in thermal power plants	7,731 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	140,509 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 18 times more than Finland
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	1.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 50% more than Russia	0.982 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	8,199 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	158,533 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 19 times more than Finland
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1.56 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 41% more than Russia	1.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per million	1,562.88 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 41% more than Russia	1,107.46 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Gross inland availability	18,063 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	374,547 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 21 times more than Finland
Gross inland availability > Per capita	3.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 32% more than Russia	2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th.
Net inland availability	9,226 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	216,014 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 23 times more than Finland
Net inland availability > Per capita	1.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Russia	1.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd.
Production > Per capita	3.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 32% more than Russia	2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Russia	1.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Russia	1.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by industry and construction	9,226 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	216,014 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 23 times more than Finland
Consumption by iron and steel industry	9,226 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	216,014 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 23 times more than Finland
Production	18,063 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	374,547 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 21 times more than Finland
Net inland availability per million	1,758.64 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Russia	1,509 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Conversion in thermal power plants per million	1,473.67 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 50% more than Russia	981.55 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	3.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 32% more than Russia	2.62 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Production per 1000	3.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 32% more than Russia	2.62 Terajoules Ranked 8th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation