Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Finland & Russia

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Finland	Russia
Consumption	4.1 billion cu m Ranked 40th.	460 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 112 times more than Finland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.16 Ranked 50th.	14.95 Ranked 2nd. 93 times more than Finland
Consumption > Per capita	874,493.65 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	4.31 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Finland
Consumption per capita	803.35 cu m Ranked 26th.	3,097.74 cu m Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Finland
Imports	3.66 billion cu m Ranked 27th.	32.5 billion cu m Ranked 17th. 9 times more than Finland
Imports per capita	803.35 cu m Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Russia	247.34 cu m Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	1,507 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	112,222 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 74 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households	1,352 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	1.77 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 1312 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 27% more than Russia	4.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	102,017 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	6.67 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 65 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	31.91 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	113.63 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	7.21 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	34.65 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Finland
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	0.0 Ranked 172nd.	334,084.8 cu m Ranked 8th.
Proved reserves	0.0 Ranked 186th.	47.8 trillion cu m Ranked 1st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.287 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	0.784 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	182.99 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	10,998.56 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.465 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	6.96 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	31.91 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	113.63 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Finland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.746 Ranked 34th.	2.52 Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.647 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	13.87 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 21 times more than Finland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	3.9 Ranked 50th.	361.8 Ranked 2nd. 93 times more than Finland
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2004 est.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	31.91 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 16 times more than Russia	2.02 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	2.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.	3.42 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 53% more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	11,749 Terajoules Ranked 47th.	489,555 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 42 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.38 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.	9.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 53% more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	3,392 Terajoules Ranked 65th.	1.98 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 585 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.647 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.	13.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 21 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	33,462 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	1.4 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 42 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.465 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.	6.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	182.99 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th.	11,001.36 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	960 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	1.57 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 1640 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	114.18 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th.	178.57 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th. 56% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	13,720 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	2.91 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 212 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	599 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	25,556 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 43 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.	20.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 8 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	19.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	46.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	167,381 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	16.27 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 97 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Imports	167,381 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	288,486 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 72% more than Finland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	167,381 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	16.27 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 97 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-68,431,787,423.037 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 36th. 45 times more than Russia	-1,514,221,347.642 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 31st.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.842 Ranked 34th.	2.8 Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Finland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	4.4 Ranked 50th.	402.1 Ranked 2nd. 91 times more than Finland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.16 Ranked 50th.	14.95 Ranked 2nd. 93 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	2.62 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	20.31 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 8 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.258 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	12.4 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 48 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	2.24 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	3.42 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 53% more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.38 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	9.79 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 53% more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.543 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	4.63 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.55 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 27% more than Russia	4.37 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.287 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.	0.784 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.543 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.	4.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	1,441 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	184,872 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 128 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.275 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th.	1.29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	182.99 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.	11,001.36 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	960 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	1.57 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 1640 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	29,107 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	625,555 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 21 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	2,440 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	996,633 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 408 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	31.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	113.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	115,737 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	9.58 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 83 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	22.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	66.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	31.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	113.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	31.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 16 times more than Russia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	37,814 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.	4.96 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 131 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	7.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.	34.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Finland
Proved > Reserves	0.0 Ranked 182nd.	47.57 trillion cu m Ranked 1st.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	2,848 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	663,333 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 233 times more than Finland
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.4 Ranked 51st.	38.8 Ranked 2nd. 97 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	22.06 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	66.89 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.275 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	1.29 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 5 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	182.99 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	10,998.56 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Finland
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	114.18 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	178.53 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 56% more than Finland
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	19.45 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	46.58 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Finland
Proved reserves per capita	0.0 Ranked 185th.	335,437.46 cu m Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.258 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.	12.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 48 times more than Finland

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Finland and Russia in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Finland & Russia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Finland and Russia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Finland and Russia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation