×

Environment Stats: compare key data on French Polynesia & Philippines

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT French Polynesia Philippines HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 33
Ranked 28th.
74
Ranked 10th. 2 times more than French Polynesia
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 27
Ranked 77th.
72
Ranked 17th. 3 times more than French Polynesia
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 0.0
Ranked 206th.
38
Ranked 18th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 692.31 kt
Ranked 158th.
76,948.64 kt
Ranked 40th. 111 times more than French Polynesia

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 2.79 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 94th. 3 times more than Philippines
0.96 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 127th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 2.79 kt
Ranked 91st. 3 times more than Philippines
0.932 kt
Ranked 125th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 883.75
Ranked 158th.
81,590.75
Ranked 41st. 92 times more than French Polynesia

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 3.3
Ranked 94th. 4 times more than Philippines
0.873
Ranked 139th.

Current issues NA uncontrolled deforestation especially in watershed areas; soil erosion; air and water pollution in major urban centers; coral reef degradation; increasing pollution of coastal mangrove swamps that are important fish breeding grounds
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 3.07
Ranked 91st. 4 times more than Philippines
0.8
Ranked 136th.

Endangered species > Bird species 32
Ranked 24th.
67
Ranked 10th. 2 times more than French Polynesia

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 1
Ranked 187th.
39
Ranked 18th. 39 times more than French Polynesia
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 4.09 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 85th. 5 times more than Philippines
0.862 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 153th.

Proportion of land area under protection 1.98%
Ranked 197th.
10.91%
Ranked 125th. 6 times more than French Polynesia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 6th. 8% more than Philippines
92.39
Ranked 118th.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 13
Ranked 114th.
60
Ranked 13th. 5 times more than French Polynesia
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 47
Ranked 43th.
216
Ranked 16th. 5 times more than French Polynesia

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 3.3
Ranked 94th. 4 times more than Philippines
0.873
Ranked 139th.

Forest area > Sq. km 1,050 km²
Ranked 156th.
71,620 km²
Ranked 63th. 68 times more than French Polynesia

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 97.12
Ranked 61st. 31% more than Philippines
74.15
Ranked 119th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 806.08
Ranked 149th.
70,858.1
Ranked 41st. 88 times more than French Polynesia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 5th. 9% more than Philippines
92.06
Ranked 96th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 47
Ranked 52nd.
229
Ranked 16th. 5 times more than French Polynesia
Biodiversity > Number 4.57
Ranked 54th.
32.33
Ranked 12th. 7 times more than French Polynesia

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 4.57
Ranked 55th.
32.33
Ranked 12th. 7 times more than French Polynesia

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.19
Ranked 174th.
$0.66
Ranked 82nd. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources > Total > Billion cubic meters 10
Ranked 121st.
479
Ranked 18th. 48 times more than French Polynesia

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita > Cubic meters 37,636.15
Ranked 19th. 7 times more than Philippines
5,301.7
Ranked 65th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 7
Ranked 163th.
204
Ranked 52nd. 29 times more than French Polynesia
CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 PPP $ of GDP 0.11 kg/PPP$
Ranked 150th.
0.23 kg/PPP$
Ranked 113th. 2 times more than French Polynesia

Proportion of land and marine area under protection 0.11%
Ranked 212th.
5.06%
Ranked 145th. 46 times more than French Polynesia

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 17.39
Ranked 10th. 49 times more than Philippines
0.358
Ranked 90th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 10th. 8% more than Philippines
92.74
Ranked 155th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.12%
Ranked 55th. 40% more than Philippines
69.35%
Ranked 110th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 4.12 km²
Ranked 84th. 5 times more than Philippines
0.835 km²
Ranked 151st.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 148
Ranked 156th.
19,982
Ranked 39th. 135 times more than French Polynesia
Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 127th.
0.267
Ranked 65th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 127th.
24,946.6
Ranked 36th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 133th.
7,073.64
Ranked 67th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 3.3
Ranked 51st. 7 times more than Philippines
0.446
Ranked 145th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 133th.
0.0757
Ranked 99th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 8
Ranked 73th.
212
Ranked 6th. 27 times more than French Polynesia
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 97.12
Ranked 67th. 23% more than Philippines
79.19
Ranked 129th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $448.08 million
Ranked 105th.
$15.55 billion
Ranked 46th. 35 times more than French Polynesia

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 0.0814%
Ranked 158th.
2.49%
Ranked 96th. 31 times more than French Polynesia

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 0.635
Ranked 91st. 2 times more than Philippines
0.263
Ranked 123th.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 111th.
0.53%
Ranked 67th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.11%
Ranked 167th.
0.35%
Ranked 68th. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 13%
Ranked 44th. 55% more than Philippines
8.38%
Ranked 125th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 883.75
Ranked 152nd.
41,642.45
Ranked 37th. 47 times more than French Polynesia

Forest area > % of land area 28.69% of land area
Ranked 96th. 19% more than Philippines
24.02% of land area
Ranked 113th.

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.11% of GNI
Ranked 172nd.
0.57% of GNI
Ranked 56th. 5 times more than French Polynesia

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 8.87%
Ranked 54th.
52.77%
Ranked 10th. 6 times more than French Polynesia

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 102nd.
$1.50 billion
Ranked 20th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 72nd.
0.81%
Ranked 33th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 100%
Ranked 9th. 96% more than Philippines
51.04%
Ranked 122nd.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 133th.
8.67%
Ranked 89th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 127th.
30.58%
Ranked 39th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.12
Ranked 55th. 40% more than Philippines
69.35
Ranked 110th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 0.08%
Ranked 124th.
0.73%
Ranked 83th. 9 times more than French Polynesia
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 1.07%
Ranked 172nd.
17.15%
Ranked 57th. 16 times more than French Polynesia
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 116th.
$982.12 million
Ranked 65th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 0.0
Ranked 176th.
3.58%
Ranked 83th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; Food and Agriculture Organisation, AQUASTAT data.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×