Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Georgia & United Kingdom

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Georgia	United Kingdom
Consumption	1.97 billion cu m Ranked 10th.	82.21 billion cu m Ranked 7th. 42 times more than Georgia
Consumption > Per capita	373,582.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.	1.5 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Georgia
Consumption per capita	394.63 cu m Ranked 21st.	1,414.8 cu m Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Georgia
Imports	1.96 billion cu m Ranked 31st.	49.1 billion cu m Ranked 6th. 25 times more than Georgia
Imports per capita	392.35 cu m Ranked 6th.	664.28 cu m Ranked 20th. 69% more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	3,618 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	149,119 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 41 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by households	8,198 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	1.37 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 168 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.	5.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.964 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.	5.91 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	65.58 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	3.56 Terajoules Ranked 57th.	38.09 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 11 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0716 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	0.312 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Georgia
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	1,907.79 cu m Ranked 66th.	4,689.17 cu m Ranked 53th. 2 times more than Georgia
Proved reserves	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 79th.	246 billion cu m Ranked 41st. 29 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 81st.	1.2 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 127 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.836 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	2.48 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	1.16 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. Twice as much as United Kingdom	0.581 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	3,573.85 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 6 times more than United Kingdom	584.15 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	65.58 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	0.131 Terajoules Ranked 81st.	60.89 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 463 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	0.118 Terajoules Ranked 81st.	60.89 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 515 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	2.42 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	29.2 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 12 times more than Georgia
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	284 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	-4,756 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.793 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.	2.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.025 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.	0.503 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 20 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita	996.33 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 18 times more than United Kingdom	54.81 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	2,338 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	376,027 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 161 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.523 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.	6.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 12 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers	4,458 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 35% more than United Kingdom	3,301 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	4,206 Terajoules Ranked 75th.	356,062 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 85 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	5,047 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	34,996 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 7 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	1.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 94% more than United Kingdom	0.581 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	1,495.09 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 11 times more than United Kingdom	131.57 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.	65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 85th.	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 135 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.	21.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 10 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.013 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	1.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 130 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.	65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.	3.95 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 79 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Gross > Production	573 Terajoules Ranked 86th.	3.67 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 6399 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	11.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 7% more than United Kingdom	10.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	516 Terajoules Ranked 86th.	3.67 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 7106 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Net inland availability	15,521 Terajoules Ranked 76th.	2.29 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 148 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	3.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	38.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 11 times more than Georgia
Proved > Reserves	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 77th.	292 billion cu m Ranked 40th. 34 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	111 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	30,276 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 273 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.	21.19 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 10 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	64.75 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	-78.971 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	22.83 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 12 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	5.09 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.99 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	8.89 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 9 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.0255 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	0.503 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 20 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.996 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	5.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	4,458 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	306,298 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 69 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.965 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	8.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 9 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	10,536 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.	1.76 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 167 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	2.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	29.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 12 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	4,317 Terajoules Ranked 79th.	535,457 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 124 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	7,820 Terajoules Ranked 6th.	7,924 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 1% more than Georgia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 70th.	19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 9 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Flared and vented	57 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	101,000 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 1772 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.	3.95 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 79 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Imports	49,532 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	624,135 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	15,587 Terajoules Ranked 16th.	35,180 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	69.77 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.	311.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th. 4 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Total resources	312,168 Terajoules Ranked 84th.	18.77 million Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 60 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-792,610,886,109.614 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 48th.	40.31 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 19 times more than United Kingdom	0.0548 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.536 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	6.24 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 12 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	1,592.31 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 12 times more than United Kingdom	131.57 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	19.96 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 9 times more than Georgia
Proved reserves per capita	1,864.61 cu m Ranked 65th.	3,880.4 cu m Ranked 57th. 2 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.	22.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 12 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.0131 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	1.69 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 129 times more than Georgia
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	11.36 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 10% more than United Kingdom	10.36 Terajoules Ranked 35th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Georgia and United Kingdom in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather
Energy	Lifestyle

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Georgia & United Kingdom

Definitions

Citation

Compare Georgia and United Kingdom in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Georgia and United Kingdom in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation