Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Germany & Latvia

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Germany	Latvia
Consumption	78.99 billion cu m Ranked 8th. 52 times more than Latvia	1.52 billion cu m Ranked 63th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.18 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 30% more than Latvia	902,730.76 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Consumption per capita	1,175.3 cu m Ranked 16th. 74% more than Latvia	677.21 cu m Ranked 35th.
Imports	87.96 billion cu m Ranked 3rd. 56 times more than Latvia	1.58 billion cu m Ranked 50th.
Imports per capita	1,154.67 cu m Ranked 7th. 49% more than Latvia	773.01 cu m Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers per million	829.61 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.	-6,165.514 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	240,000 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 495 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	1.35 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 290 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	6.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 76% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	811,901 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 32 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	33.36 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	125 billion cu m Ranked 48th.	0.0 Ranked 127th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	131.5 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 63% more than Latvia	80.85 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	22.51 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-41,760 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers	67,328 Terajoules Ranked 1st.	-15,804 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 49% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	496,000 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 114 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	544,900 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 63 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	121.26 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 21st.	356.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	832,744 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 22 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	10.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 65% more than Germany
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 66% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 60 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	399.43 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th. 86% more than Latvia	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	10.1 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 65% more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.228 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-506.37 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	16.37 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.412 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 2% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	10.85 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 82% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.33 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 49% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	6.61 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 76% more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita	829.61 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd.	-6,111.369 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.412 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st. 2% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	34,000 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 35 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	10.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 82% more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.86 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 189 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	22.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	894,900 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 65 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	18,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 42% more than Latvia	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	10,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 12 times more than Latvia	820 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.228 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	9.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 11% more than Germany
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 60 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Imports	3.42 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 51 times more than Latvia	66,710 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	10,845 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 58 times more than Latvia	186 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	41.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 43% more than Latvia	29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.75 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 116 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	33.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	110,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 24 times more than Latvia	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	121.26 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	356.44 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	9.84 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 11% more than Germany
Proved reserves per capita	1,540.41 cu m Ranked 67th.	0.0 Ranked 127th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	16.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	41.48 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 43% more than Latvia	29 Terajoules Ranked 17th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Germany and Latvia in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather
Energy	Lifestyle

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Germany & Latvia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Germany and Latvia in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Germany and Latvia in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation