Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Germany & Norway

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Germany	Norway	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry per million	124.32 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 64% more than Norway	75.92 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by energy sector	5,165 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 344 times more than Norway	15 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Consumption by energy sector per million	62.61 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 19 times more than Norway	3.24 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	3.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 9 times more than Norway	0.332 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	10.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Norway	1.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	10.35 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Norway	1.66 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	3.94 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Norway	0.233 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by other consumers	853,270 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 140 times more than Norway	6,111 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	10.35 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 8 times more than Norway	1.32 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	324,969 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 472 times more than Norway	688 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	3.94 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 26 times more than Norway	0.149 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000	7.52 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Norway	1.28 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000	7.97 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Norway	0.786 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	14.29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 8 times more than Norway	1.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	2.13 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th.	226.68 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 2nd. 106 times more than Germany
Gross > Production > Per capita	15.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Norway	3.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita	7.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Norway	1.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita	7.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Norway	0.786 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants	657,272 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 181 times more than Norway	3,636 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by chemical industry	10,255 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 29 times more than Norway	351 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.124 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 63% more than Norway	0.076 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Consumption by industry and construction	324,969 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 301 times more than Norway	1,078 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities	2,107 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 1054 times more than Norway	2 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities > Per capita	25.54 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 59 times more than Norway	0.433 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 9th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	10.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 8 times more than Norway	1.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	3.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 26 times more than Norway	0.149 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	99,677 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 59 times more than Norway	1,686 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	1.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Norway	0.365 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	15.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Norway	2.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	853,270 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 112 times more than Norway	7,652 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	3.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Norway	0.233 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Gross inland availability	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 95 times more than Norway	13,501 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants	620,347 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 105 times more than Norway	5,931 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	248,516 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 162 times more than Norway	1,537 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.063 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 21 times more than Norway	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Net inland availability	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 135 times more than Norway	8,730 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities per million	25.54 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 59 times more than Norway	0.433 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	15.5 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Norway	2.92 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Net inland availability per 1000	14.29 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 8 times more than Norway	1.89 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	1.21 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Norway	0.365 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by households per 1000	3.01 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 9 times more than Norway	0.332 Terajoules Ranked 24th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation