×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Guam & United Kingdom

Definitions

STAT Guam United Kingdom HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 14
Ranked 83th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
4
Ranked 174th.
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 9
Ranked 163th.
43
Ranked 45th. 5 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 2
Ranked 182nd.
5
Ranked 148th. 3 times more than Guam
CO2 emissions > Kt 4,080.58 kt
Ranked 115th.
558,461 kt
Ranked 8th. 137 times more than Guam

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 24.91 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
9.37 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 25.86 kt
Ranked 5th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
9.38 kt
Ranked 31st.

Current issues extirpation of native bird population by the rapid proliferation of the brown tree snake, an exotic, invasive species continues to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (has met Kyoto Protocol target of a 12.5% reduction from 1990 levels and intends to meet the legally binding target and move toward a domestic goal of a 20% cut in emissions by 2010); by 2005 the government reduced the amount of industrial and commercial waste disposed of in landfill sites to 85% of 1998 levels and recycled or composted at least 25% of household waste, increasing to 33% by 2015
Endangered species > Bird species 12
Ranked 77th. 6 times more than United Kingdom
2
Ranked 172nd.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 9
Ranked 146th.
34
Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Guam
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 4
Ranked 113th.
14
Ranked 79th. 4 times more than Guam

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 2
Ranked 175th.
5
Ranked 139th. 3 times more than Guam
Forest area > Sq. km 260 km²
Ranked 170th.
28,450 km²
Ranked 90th. 109 times more than Guam

Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 1.53 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 127th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
0.472 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 163th.

Proportion of land area under protection 26.84%
Ranked 40th.
27.91%
Ranked 36th. 4% more than Guam

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 99.42
Ranked 51st.
100
Ranked 14th. 1% more than Guam

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 97.39
Ranked 58th.
100
Ranked 18th. 3% more than Guam

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 99.42
Ranked 43th.
100
Ranked 14th. 1% more than Guam

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 4
Ranked 139th.
15
Ranked 91st. 4 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Number 0.21
Ranked 165th.
3.55
Ranked 65th. 17 times more than Guam

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 0.213
Ranked 170th.
3.55
Ranked 66th. 17 times more than Guam

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 12
Ranked 145th.
778
Ranked 27th. 65 times more than Guam
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 5.27%
Ranked 142nd.
23.37%
Ranked 44th. 4 times more than Guam

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 1.35
Ranked 51st. 23 times more than United Kingdom
0.0578
Ranked 154th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.39%
Ranked 53th.
100%
Ranked 17th. 3% more than Guam

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 99.42
Ranked 76th.
100
Ranked 20th. 1% more than Guam

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 1.64 km²
Ranked 121st. 3 times more than United Kingdom
0.472 km²
Ranked 161st.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 1,111
Ranked 111th.
147,199
Ranked 6th. 132 times more than Guam
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 12
Ranked 61st.
149
Ranked 7th. 12 times more than Guam
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 97.39
Ranked 63th.
100
Ranked 19th. 3% more than Guam

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 2.63%
Ranked 93th.
16.61%
Ranked 35th. 6 times more than Guam

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 7.22
Ranked 4th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
2.51
Ranked 26th.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 146th.
$57.72 billion
Ranked 12th.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 12.99%
Ranked 40th.
18.21%
Ranked 28th. 40% more than Guam

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.39
Ranked 53th.
100
Ranked 17th. 3% more than Guam

Sea > Planned marine protected area 30% of nearby marine ecosystem by 2020. Establish an ecologically coherent network of marine protected areas by 2012.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 1.03%
Ranked 77th.
4.56%
Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Guam
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 20.86%
Ranked 43th.
22.35%
Ranked 37th. 7% more than Guam
Forest area > % of land area 47.27% of land area
Ranked 44th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
11.76% of land area
Ranked 142nd.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 137th.
0.0
Ranked 155th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; Wikipedia: Marine protected area (International efforts)

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×