Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Japan	Latvia
Consumption	112.6 billion cu m Ranked 4th. 74 times more than Latvia	1.52 billion cu m Ranked 63th.
Consumption > Per capita	787,077.22 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.	902,730.76 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 15% more than Japan
Consumption per capita	742.17 cu m Ranked 30th. 10% more than Latvia	677.21 cu m Ranked 35th.
Imports	122.2 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 77 times more than Latvia	1.58 billion cu m Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	35,348 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 73 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.277 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 31% more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	435,726 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 94 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.572 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	608,830 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 140 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	131,972 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 15 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	41,127 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 42 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 73th.	0.0 Ranked 127th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 54 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	16.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 3% more than Japan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 52 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-1,045,783,962,308.45 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	73,082 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Latvia	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	16.14 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 3% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.76 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	16.01 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 46% more than Latvia	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	3.41 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 68% more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	24.69 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	29 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 17% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.572 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.03 Terajoules Ranked 60th.	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	10.06 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 2% more than Japan
Imports per capita	707.84 cu m Ranked 18th.	773.01 cu m Ranked 14th. 9% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th. 4 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	2.05 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 81 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.277 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 31% more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 7% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.18 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 91% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million	321.88 Terajoules Ranked 4th.	421.21 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 31% more than Japan
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	4,846 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 37% more than Latvia	3,541 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st. 3% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	52,067 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 54 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.04 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 106 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 91% more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	240,402 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 18 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	16,607 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 26% more than Latvia	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 44 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	16.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 46% more than Latvia	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 52 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Imports	3.15 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 47 times more than Latvia	66,710 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	24.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 17% more than Japan
Including LNG > Net inland availability	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 8th. 54 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	10.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 2% more than Japan
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.13 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 44 times more than Japan
Proved reserves per capita	164.24 cu m Ranked 90th.	0.0 Ranked 127th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	37.93 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	1,539.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 41 times more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	3.41 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 68% more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 3% more than Japan
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Japan

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Japan and Latvia in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Japan and Latvia in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Japan and Latvia in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation