×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Japan & New Caledonia

Definitions

STAT Japan New Caledonia HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 40
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than New Caledonia
15
Ranked 67th.
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 66
Ranked 23th. 2 times more than New Caledonia
30
Ranked 70th.
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 27
Ranked 33th. 3 times more than New Caledonia
9
Ranked 98th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 1.23 million kt
Ranked 5th. 659 times more than New Caledonia
1,868.13 kt
Ranked 137th.

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 9.64 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 33th. 16% more than New Caledonia
8.28 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 42nd.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 9.64 kt
Ranked 29th. 16% more than New Caledonia
8.28 kt
Ranked 38th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 1.17 million
Ranked 6th. 299 times more than New Caledonia
3,920.02
Ranked 126th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 9.19
Ranked 32nd.
15.68
Ranked 13th. 71% more than Japan

Current issues air pollution from power plant emissions results in acid rain; acidification of lakes and reservoirs degrading water quality and threatening aquatic life; Japan is one of the largest consumers of fish and tropical timber, contributing to the depletion of these resources in Asia and elsewhere erosion caused by mining exploitation and forest fires
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 9.81
Ranked 28th.
11.74
Ranked 22nd. 20% more than Japan

Endangered species > Bird species 40
Ranked 18th. 3 times more than New Caledonia
14
Ranked 59th.

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 27
Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than New Caledonia
9
Ranked 88th.
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 1.95 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 114th.
30.58 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 22nd. 16 times more than Japan

Proportion of land area under protection 16.54%
Ranked 93th.
61.29%
Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Japan

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 8th. 2% more than New Caledonia
98.45
Ranked 69th.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 40
Ranked 22nd. 2 times more than New Caledonia
17
Ranked 77th.
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 12
Ranked 83th.
218
Ranked 15th. 18 times more than Japan

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 9.19
Ranked 32nd.
15.68
Ranked 13th. 71% more than Japan

Forest area > Sq. km 248,680 km²
Ranked 23th. 35 times more than New Caledonia
7,170 km²
Ranked 127th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 9th. The same as New Caledonia
100
Ranked 2nd.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 1.25 million
Ranked 6th. 440 times more than New Caledonia
2,846.93
Ranked 123th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 7th. 2% more than New Caledonia
98.45
Ranked 57th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 17
Ranked 85th.
258
Ranked 14th. 15 times more than Japan
Adjusted net national income > Current US$ per capita $40,799.63
Ranked 12th. 4 times more than New Caledonia
$11,024.72
Ranked 27th.

Biodiversity > Number 35.96
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than New Caledonia
8.55
Ranked 33th.

Adjusted net national income > Current US$ $5.21 trillion
Ranked 4th. 2218 times more than New Caledonia
$2.35 billion
Ranked 119th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 35.96
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than New Caledonia
8.55
Ranked 33th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.24
Ranked 162nd.
$0.86
Ranked 69th. 4 times more than Japan

Pollution > PM10, country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 24.07
Ranked 105th.
48.02
Ranked 43th. Twice as much as Japan

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 216
Ranked 50th. 6 times more than New Caledonia
38
Ranked 104th.
CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 PPP $ of GDP 0.37 kg/PPP$
Ranked 69th.
0.38 kg/PPP$
Ranked 69th. 3% more than Japan

Proportion of land and marine area under protection 10.97%
Ranked 107th.
30.5%
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Japan

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 0.282
Ranked 99th.
35.03
Ranked 4th. 124 times more than Japan

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100%
Ranked 8th. The same as New Caledonia
100%
Ranked 1st.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 13th. 2% more than New Caledonia
98.45
Ranked 95th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 1.95 km²
Ranked 111th.
30.59 km²
Ranked 20th. 16 times more than Japan

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 315,274
Ranked 3rd. 693 times more than New Caledonia
455
Ranked 134th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 3.42
Ranked 18th.
6.37
Ranked 7th. 86% more than Japan

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 197,057.25
Ranked 5th.
0.0
Ranked 121st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 1.55
Ranked 45th.
0.0
Ranked 121st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 4.02
Ranked 36th.
8.99
Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Japan

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 435,965.96
Ranked 6th. 274 times more than New Caledonia
1,591.48
Ranked 71st.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 135
Ranked 10th. 6 times more than New Caledonia
21
Ranked 34th.
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 100
Ranked 10th. The same as New Caledonia
100
Ranked 2nd.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $675.02 billion
Ranked 2nd. 1963 times more than New Caledonia
$343.84 million
Ranked 114th.

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 5.59%
Ranked 71st.
25.2%
Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Japan

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 2.49
Ranked 28th. 14% more than New Caledonia
2.17
Ranked 35th.
Emissions > PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 29.64
Ranked 106th.
68.94
Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Japan

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.18% of GNI
Ranked 139th.
0.4% of GNI
Ranked 93th. 2 times more than Japan

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 29.97%
Ranked 20th. 2 times more than New Caledonia
12.45%
Ranked 42nd.

Adjusted net national income > Current US$, % of GDP 88.44%
Ranked 28th. 1% more than New Caledonia
87.64%
Ranked 42nd.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ $83.70 million
Ranked 58th.
0.0
Ranked 88th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 43.73%
Ranked 141st.
57.34%
Ranked 114th. 31% more than Japan

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 37.24%
Ranked 31st.
40.6%
Ranked 27th. 9% more than Japan

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 5.19%
Ranked 30th. 24 times more than New Caledonia
0.22%
Ranked 105th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 14.12%
Ranked 82nd. 91% more than New Caledonia
7.39%
Ranked 116th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 511,993.87
Ranked 4th. 228 times more than New Caledonia
2,247.87
Ranked 126th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 88th.
$257,922.26
Ranked 63th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ $1.23 billion
Ranked 62nd.
0.0
Ranked 102nd.

PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 31.17 mcg/m³
Ranked 115th.
67.02 mcg/m³
Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Japan

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.19%
Ranked 124th.
0.51%
Ranked 68th. 3 times more than Japan

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 13.31%
Ranked 35th. 4% more than New Caledonia
12.82%
Ranked 47th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 16.83%
Ranked 72nd.
0.0
Ranked 121st.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 0.02%
Ranked 87th.
0.0
Ranked 99th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 91st.
0.0
Ranked 56th.

Forest area > % of land area 68.22% of land area
Ranked 14th. 74% more than New Caledonia
39.22% of land area
Ranked 65th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 80th.
0.01%
Ranked 50th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100
Ranked 8th. The same as New Caledonia
100
Ranked 1st.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 0.0363%
Ranked 156th. 32% more than New Caledonia
0.0276%
Ranked 163th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Kiren Dev Pandey, David Wheeler, Bart Ostro, Uwe Deichmann, Kirk Hamilton, and Katherine Bolt. ""Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations in Residential and Pollution Hotspot Areas of World Cities: New Estimates Based on the Global Model of Ambient Particulates (GMAPS),"" World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department (2006).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. GDP figures sourced from World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×