×

Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Latvia & Lithuania

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Latvia Lithuania HISTORY
Consumption by agriculture per million 67.38 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
129.16 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 92% more than Latvia

Consumption by chemical industry per million 3.04 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
1,488.15 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 489 times more than Latvia

Consumption by households > Per capita 7.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 22% more than Lithuania
6.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th.

Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 10.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 18% more than Lithuania
8.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th.

Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 10.58 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 18% more than Lithuania
8.97 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.

Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 0.297 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
2.13 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Latvia

Consumption by iron and steel industry per million 1.74 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Lithuania
0.579 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.

Consumption by other consumers 5,821 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
7,920 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 36% more than Latvia

Consumption by other consumers per 1000 2.53 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 9% more than Lithuania
2.32 Terajoules
Ranked 13th.

Consumption by other industries and construction 673 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
2,203 Terajoules
Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Latvia

Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 0.293 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
0.645 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Latvia

Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000 7.16 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 38% more than Lithuania
5.19 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.

Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000 6.38 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
6.74 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 6% more than Latvia

Net inland availability > Per capita 10.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th.
11.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 2% more than Latvia

Station use and station loss per million 370.79 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 4% more than Lithuania
355.86 Terajoules
Ranked 4th.

Consumption by energy sector per million 103.46 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
413.55 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Latvia

Statistical differences > Per capita -2,489,626,556.016 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 8th.
-33,974,753,243.709 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector 238 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.
1,412 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Latvia

Gross > Production > Per capita 13.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.
14.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 8% more than Latvia

Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita 7.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 38% more than Lithuania
5.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th.

Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita 6.38 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th.
6.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 6% more than Latvia

Gross > Production > Thermal power plants 14,677 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
23,028 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 57% more than Latvia

By other energy products 238 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Lithuania
57 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.

Consumption by chemical industry 7 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
5,081 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 726 times more than Latvia

Consumption by agriculture 155 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.
441 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Latvia

Consumption by agriculture > Per capita 67.38 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 8th.
129.16 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 6th. 92% more than Latvia

Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th.
1.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th. 496 times more than Latvia

Consumption by industry and construction 684 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.
7,284 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 11 times more than Latvia

Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 9% more than Lithuania
2.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.

Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 0.293 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th.
0.645 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Latvia

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 5,033 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.
7,458 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 48% more than Latvia

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita 2.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th. About the same as Lithuania
2.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.

Gross inland availability > Per capita 13.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.
14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 8% more than Latvia

Consumption by households and other consumers 24,336 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.
30,616 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 26% more than Latvia

Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 0.297 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 31st.
2.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Latvia

Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 1.74 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Lithuania
0.579 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 16th.

Gross inland availability 30,291 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.
48,569 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 60% more than Latvia

Station use and station loss > Per capita 0.371 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd. 4% more than Lithuania
0.356 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.

Gross > Production > Pure heating plants 16,467 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
17,727 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 8% more than Latvia

Consumption by households 18,360 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.
22,255 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 21% more than Latvia

Consumption by iron and steel industry 4 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. Twice as much as Lithuania
2 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.

Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.103 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.
0.414 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Latvia

Net inland availability 25,020 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.
37,900 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 51% more than Latvia

Gross inland availability per 1000 13.17 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
14.23 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 8% more than Latvia

Net inland availability per 1000 10.88 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
11.1 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 2% more than Latvia

Station use and station loss 853 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
1,215 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 42% more than Latvia

By other energy products per million 103.46 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Lithuania
16.69 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.

Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000 2.19 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. About the same as Lithuania
2.18 Terajoules
Ranked 7th.

Consumption by households per 1000 7.98 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 22% more than Lithuania
6.52 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×