Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Libya & Pakistan

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Libya	Pakistan
Consumption	6.84 billion cu m Ranked 36th.	42.9 billion cu m Ranked 15th. 6 times more than Libya
Consumption > Per capita	890,893.27 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Pakistan	217,013.83 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption per capita	935.88 cu m Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Pakistan	224.54 cu m Ranked 25th.
Imports	0.0 Ranked 171st.	0.0 Ranked 134th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	49,000 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 39% more than Pakistan	35,281 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	44.93 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Pakistan	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	10.39 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Pakistan	3.53 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	0.7 Ranked 41st.	2.2 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Libya
Production > Billion cubic metres	7 Ranked 41st.	23.2 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Libya
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.26 Ranked 41st.	0.86 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Libya
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	1.27 Ranked 21st. 9 times more than Pakistan	0.15 Ranked 40th.
Proved reserves	1.55 trillion cu m Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Pakistan	679.6 billion cu m Ranked 28th.
Reserves	1.32 trillion cubic feet Ranked 15th. 90% more than Pakistan	695.6 billion cubic feet Ranked 22nd.
Reserves per capita	236,126.88 cubic feet Ranked 9th. 54 times more than Pakistan	4,403.33 cubic feet Ranked 37th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	254,775.51 cu m Ranked 12th. 53 times more than Pakistan	4,852.46 cu m Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	10.4 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 52 times more than Pakistan	0.199 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 114th.	0.0 Ranked 75th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	9.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Pakistan	1.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	83,511 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	417,768 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	9.78 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 44 times more than Pakistan	0.223 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	13.77 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 17 times more than Pakistan	0.804 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	44.93 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Pakistan	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	146.08 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 19 times more than Pakistan	7.74 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	81.61 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 11 times more than Pakistan	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.26 Ranked 41st.	0.86 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	8.98 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 35 times more than Pakistan	0.253 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	9.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 43 times more than Pakistan	0.226 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	3.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 46 times more than Pakistan	0.077 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	20,754 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 72% more than Pakistan	12,072 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	9.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Pakistan	2.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	58,108 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	323,494 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 6 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	13.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 16 times more than Pakistan	0.815 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	14.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 5 times more than Pakistan	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	42.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Pakistan	7.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	83,511 Terajoules Ranked 57th.	417,768 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 5 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 5 times more than Pakistan	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	8.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 33 times more than Pakistan	0.257 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	42.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Pakistan	7.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	50,220.03 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 26% more than Pakistan	40,000 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	251,345 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	6.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 173 times more than Pakistan	0.036 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	36,523.66 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 6 times more than Pakistan	5,621 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Net > Production	456,545.7 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Net inland availability	58,108 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	557,903 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 10 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	9.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Pakistan	3.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	9,939.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 49 times more than Pakistan	202.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Total resources	58.18 million Terajoules Ranked 21st. 85% more than Pakistan	31.49 million Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Proved > Reserves	1.54 trillion cu m Ranked 23th. 83% more than Pakistan	840.2 billion cu m Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.93 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 6 times more than Pakistan	2.64 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	14.93 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 6 times more than Pakistan	2.64 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	6.53 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 183 times more than Pakistan	0.0356 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	3.71 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 49 times more than Pakistan	0.0764 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	10.39 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Pakistan	2.05 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	3.71 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 49 times more than Pakistan	0.0764 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	10.39 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Pakistan	1.73 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	20,754 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 72% more than Pakistan	12,072 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	58,108 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	273,029 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	77,025 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	127,020 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 65% more than Libya
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	251,345 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Libya
Including LNG > Gross > Production	817,216 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	1.22 million Terajoules Ranked 24th. 50% more than Libya
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	2.04 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Pakistan	323.01 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 11th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.14 Ranked 21st. 8 times more than Pakistan	0.135 Ranked 39th.
Proved reserves per capita	257,732.52 cu m Ranked 12th. 73 times more than Pakistan	3,516.89 cu m Ranked 59th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	6.3 Ranked 41st.	20.9 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Libya

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Libya and Pakistan in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Travel
Energy	Lifestyle	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Libya & Pakistan

Definitions

Citation

Compare Libya and Pakistan in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Libya and Pakistan in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation