Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Luxembourg & Norway

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Luxembourg	Norway	HISTORY
Consumption by agriculture	156 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 39 times more than Norway	4 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Consumption by agriculture > Per capita	341.57 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 395 times more than Norway	0.865 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.
Consumption by agriculture per million	335.37 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 388 times more than Norway	0.865 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Consumption by chemical industry	918 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Norway	351 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by chemical industry per million	1,973.52 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 26 times more than Norway	75.92 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	3.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 10 times more than Norway	0.332 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.56 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 2 times more than Norway	1.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.5 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 2 times more than Norway	1.66 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.97 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Norway	0.233 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Gross > Production > Per capita	5.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 85% more than Norway	3.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants	2,544 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	3,636 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 43% more than Luxembourg
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita	5.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Norway	0.786 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000	5.47 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Norway	0.786 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	5.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Norway	1.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	13.89 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd.	226.68 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 2nd. 16 times more than Luxembourg
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	2.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 26 times more than Norway	0.076 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Consumption by industry and construction	918 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	1,078 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 17% more than Luxembourg
Gross inland availability > Per capita	5.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 91% more than Norway	2.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	1,626 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	7,652 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Luxembourg
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	2.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Norway	0.233 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Gross inland availability	2,544 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	13,501 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 5 times more than Luxembourg
Consumption by households	1,470 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	1,537 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 5% more than Luxembourg
Net inland availability	2,544 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	8,730 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Luxembourg
Gross inland availability per 1000	5.47 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 87% more than Norway	2.92 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Net inland availability per 1000	5.47 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Norway	1.89 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Consumption by households per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 10 times more than Norway	0.332 Terajoules Ranked 24th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation